Handbook of structural equation modeling

By R. Hoyle. 2012

1,124 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A Gentle Introduction to Bayesian Analysis: Applications to Developmental Research (2013, unknown): “Concerning the latter, we used the Gelman – Rubin criterion (for more information, see Gelman et al., 2004) to monitor convergence, which is the default setting of Mplus.”
Lack of Theory Building and Testing Impedes Progress in The Factor and Network Literature (2020, background): “(Vaidyanathan et al., 2015) Factor models require little introduction, and represent a sophisticated statistical framework (Brown, 2015; Hoyle, 2012; Kline, 2015).”
Using goal facilitation theory to explain the relationships between calling and organization-directed citizenship behavior and job satisfaction (2017, methodology): “As the CFA analysis above supported the structural validity of our measurement model, we proceeded to conduct structural equation modeling focused on directional relations between observed variables (Hoyle, 2012).”
What’s So Great About Self-Control? Examining the Importance of Effortful Self-Control and Temptation in Predicting Real-Life Depletion and Goal Attainment (2015, background): “BIC difference of 0–2 suggests weak evidence in favor of model with smaller BIC; 2–6 suggests positive evidence; 6–10 strong evidence, and >10 suggests very strong evidence (Kaplan & Depaoli, 2012).”