Social Entrepreneurship: A Modern Approach to Social Value Creation
By A. Brooks. 2008
167 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/aceb806863c9e6fd53ef539e023eaa3b206efc7a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- James L. Koch
- John Lepoutre
- Rachida Justo
- G. Desa
- Jeffery S. McMullen
- Misagh Tasavori
- Manaf Al-Okaily
- Hamza Alqudah
Citations in the corpus
- The relationship between social entrepreneurship and sustainable development from economic growth perspective: 15 ‘RCEP’ countries (2021, background): “Considering this broad definition, the literature review has identified two main aspects: propensity to innovate and risk aversion (Brooks 2009).”
- Delineating the Domain of Development Entrepreneurship: A Market–Based Approach to Facilitating Inclusive Economic Growth (2011, background): “Instead, they offer blended value comprised of social and economic return on investment (Brooks, 2009; Emerson, 2003).”
- Market orientation, market disruptiveness capability and social enterprise performance: An empirical study from the United Kingdom (2019, background): “…social entrepreneurship context, possessing market disruptiveness capability would enable social enterprises to develop innovative solutions to social problems that would previously have been considered impossible (Austin et al., 2006; Brooks, 2009; Fowler, 2000; Kong, 2010; Mair & Marti, 2006).”
- Designing a global standardized methodology for measuring social entrepreneurship activity: the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor social entrepreneurship study (2011, background): “1 INTRODUCTION Attention for social entrepreneurship, defined as entrepreneurial activity with the explicit objective to address societal pains, has increased significantly in the developing and the developed world (Brooks, 2009; Seelos & Mair, 2007: 38).”
- Scaling Social Impact: Building Sustainable Social Ventures at the Base-of-the-Pyramid (2014, background): “In essence, there are two questions: Does the innovation work in the local context? Will it continue to work in the future? The second consideration relates to the fact that the beneficiaries or customers of social entrepreneurial organizations are not as likely to be able to afford to pay a convent”