Correction for Unreliability of Multifactor Measures: Comparison of Alpha and Parallel Forms Approaches

By W. Rogers, Neal Schmitt, Morell E. Mullins. 2002

49 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ace8fcd8d0e659f00d735df49c88326e31121ad2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Helen M. Williams
2. A. Campo-Arias
3. Sharon K. Parker
4. Nick Turner
5. H. Oviedo
6. Marylène Gagné
7. Adam M. Grant
8. Ward van Zoonen

In Statistics and Probability

1. Helen M. Williams
2. Sharon K. Parker
3. Nick Turner

Citations in the corpus

• Metodología de investigación y lectura crítica de estudios Aproximación al uso del coeficiente alfa (2005, background): “mensionales, no en escalas multidimensionales (3,20,21,33).”
• Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. (2006, methodology): “The reliability of this overall measure, calculated using Cronbach’s (1951) parallel forms reliability formula that has been recommended for multidimensional scales (see Rogers, Schmitt, & Mullins, 2002 ), was .77.”