Validation of the Flourishing Scale and Scale of Positive and Negative Experience in Portugal
By A. Silva, António Caetano. Social Indicators Research, 2011
257 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ac3ef417611bb2059b6d1a119659dd2c3953d8a7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Evangelia Demerouti
- Zhizhang Wang
- Tianyuan Liu
- Xiaoqing Tang
- Wenjie Duan
- Katsunori Sumi
- Wilmar B. Schaufeli
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Evangelia Demerouti
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Zhizhang Wang
- Xiaoqing Tang
- Josette M. P. Gevers
- A. Jarden
- Wenjie Duan
- Tianyuan Liu
In Social Psychology
- Evangelia Demerouti
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Wilmar B. Schaufeli
- Josette M. P. Gevers
- M. Tims
- Toon W. Taris
- S. Rothmann
- Zhizhang Wang
Citations in the corpus
- Job crafting and extra-role behavior: The role of work engagement and flourishing (2015, background): “Several studies have confirmed the validity, reliability, and the invariant one-factor structure of the 8-item scale across different populations (e.g., Khodarahimi, 2013; Silva & Caetano, 2013).”
- Psychometric Evaluation of the Simplified Chinese Version of Flourishing Scale (2016, methodology): “The scale encompasses 8 items and has well-established psychometric characteristics in different countries, such as America (Diener et al., 2010), Japan (Sumi, 2014), Portugal (Silva & Caetano, 2013), New Zealand (Hone, Jarden, & Schofield, 2014), and Germany (Esch, Jose, Gimpel, von Scheidt, & Mich”
- Reliability and Validity of Japanese Versions of the Flourishing Scale and the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (2013, background): “2009, 2010) or portuguese version (Silva and Caetano 2011).”
- Psychometric Properties of the Flourishing Scale in a New Zealand Sample (2013, background): “…model 4—item 4 and 6’s errors covaried; model 5—item 6 and 8’s errors covaried; model 6—item 6 and 7’s errors covaried published reports on the FS (Diener et al. 2010; Silva and Caetano 2011) and provide evidence for the construct validity of the FS for use among adult New Zealand populations.”
- Thriving on demand: Challenging work results in employee flourishing through appraisals and resources. (2020, unknown): “Flourishing was operationalized with Diener et al.’s (2010) eight-item, α = .91, flourishing scale, which measures the unidimensional structure of the flourishing (Diener et al., 2010; Silva & Caetano, 2013).”