Psychometric Properties of the Flourishing Scale in a New Zealand Sample
By L. Hone, A. Jarden, G. Schofield. Social Indicators Research, 2013
153 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, General Health Professions, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b514dbd962b4c7ce4ae6bef3b5f3eb9cc923c541
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
- Zhizhang Wang
- F. Smit
- Ernst T. Bohlmeijer
- Xiaoqing Tang
- Gerben J. Westerhof
- L. Bolier
- Heleen Riper
- Wenjie Duan
In General Health Professions
- Zhizhang Wang
- F. Smit
- Ernst T. Bohlmeijer
- Xiaoqing Tang
- Gerben J. Westerhof
- L. Bolier
- Heleen Riper
- Wenjie Duan
In Social Psychology
- Ernst T. Bohlmeijer
- Gerben J. Westerhof
- Zhizhang Wang
- F. Smit
- Xiaoqing Tang
- L. Bolier
- Heleen Riper
- Wenjie Duan
Citations in the corpus
- Psychometric Evaluation of the Simplified Chinese Version of Flourishing Scale (2016, methodology): “This study demonstrated the satisfactory psychometric properties of FS among a Chinese community, as reported in other countries (Diener et al., 2010; Esch et al., 2013; Hone et al., 2014; Silva & Caetano, 2013; Sumi, 2014).”
- Measuring flourishing: The impact of operational definitions on the prevalence of high levels of wellbeing (2014, methodology): “As the published studies using the 8-item FS only report mean and percentile rank scores, and no cut points or component combinations required for categorical diagnoses (Hone et al., 2013; Silva & Caetano, 2013), we determined that individuals with total scores of 48 and above be categorised as flou”