Economic analysis of food safety

By J. Antle. 2001

155 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Reliability of Certification: Quality Labels as a Consumer Policy Tool (2005, background): “Since the seminal studies of DeAngelo (1981a, b) and Antle (1982), many theoretical approaches”
Traceability, Liability, and Incentives for Food Safety and Quality (2008, unknown): “For a discussion related to these issues, see Antle (2001). 16 In this model, our attention is limited to liability and food safety. In practice, consumers may be willing to pay for traceability for other reasons. For more details, see for example Golan et al. (2004).”
THE MANAGEMENT OF PERCEIVED RISK IN THE FOOD SUPPLY CHAIN: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF RETAILER-LED BEEF QUALITY ASSURANCE SCHEMES IN GERMANY AND ITALY (2001, background): “…imperfect information, information asymmetry exists in which information is more imperfect for one party; for example, firms may have better information than consumers regarding production processes, but may not necessarily have better information on the safety attributes of a product (Antle 1998).”
Quality Certification vs. Product Traceability: Consumer Preferences for Informational Attributes of Pork in Georgia * (2009, background): “[5] J. M. Antle, Economic Analysis of Food Safety, in: B. L. Gardner, G. C. Rausser (Eds.)”
Marketing Opportunities for Certified Pork Chops (2006, background): “The problem for the supplier is that gathering, guaranteeing, and providing food quality information is an inherently costly activity (Antle 2001).”