WHY SOCIAL PREFERENCES M ATTER - T HE IMPACT OF N ON-SELFISH MOTIVES O N C OMPETITION, COOPERATION A ND INCENTIVES
By Ernst Fehr, Urs Fischbacher. 2002
1,243 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Demography, General Decision Sciences, Safety Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ab83d2e76157c0bf469342be0d1a90a960e7a5d1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Demography
- Niclas Berggren
- Erle C. Ellis
- Christian Bjørnskov
- Fredrik Carlsson
- Paul Smeets
- T. Ruof
- Rob Bauer
- Loukas Balafoutas
In General Decision Sciences
- Fredrik Carlsson
- Peter Martinsson
- Loukas Balafoutas
- C. Spash
- Dana B. Minbaeva
- M. Osterloh
- Michel Tuan Pham
- R. Burlando
In Safety Research
- Fredrik Carlsson
- N. J. Foss
- Dana B. Minbaeva
- Torben Pedersen
- Loukas Balafoutas
- M. Osterloh
- Fabian Homberg
- Benedikt Herrmann
Citations in the corpus
- Are People Inequality-Averse, or Just Risk-Averse? (2001, positive): “Generally, there is by now much empirical evidence that people are not motivated solely by their own monetary payoffs, and alternative theories in which people have concerns regarding equality and fairness are therefore proposed (see e.g. Fehr and Fischbacher 2002).”
- Vive la Différence: Social Banks and Reciprocity in the Credit Market (2013, neutral): “Similarly, Fehr and Fischbacher (2002) find that a number of people are willing to sacrifice material payoffs to reward kind actions or punish unfriendly ones.”
- The appearance of homo rivalis: Social preferences and the nature of rent seeking (2008, background): “Economists are now also beginning to investigate wider implications of pro-social preferences (Fehr and Fischbacher, 2002; Gächter, 2007).”
- Fairness, Reciprocity, and Wage Rigidity (2004, neutral): “In their experiments, subjects play a game, in which an investor chooses a quantity of money to give to a respondent and specifies the amount he or she would like the respondent 1 See figure 6 in Fehr and Fischbacher (2002).”
- Much of the ‘economics of property rights’ devalues property and legal rights (2015, background): “14 The notion of other-regarding, ‘social preferences’ has become respectable (Bowles and Gintis, 2011; Charness and Rabin, 2002; Fehr and Fischbacher, 2002).”
- Social Connections and Incentives in the Workplace: Evidence from Personnel Data (2009, neutral): “7Fehr and Fischbacher (2002) provided an overview of the laboratory evidence on social preferences in workplace environments.”