Evaluating the structure of human values with confirmatory factor analysis

By Shalom H. Schwartz, K. Boehnke. 2004

1,123 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ab1bf80cbfac48b4f206a241a4c87b36a698f3e3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Overcoming the barriers to pro-environmental behaviors in the workplace: A systematic review (2018, methodology): “Following the commonly accepted theorization in individual psychology literature (e.g., Deci and Ryan, 1991, Schwartz and Boehnke, 2004), obstacles were divided into two groups: within (barriers associated with personal deliberation) and between (barriers related to communication with other…”
Social status, cognitive ability, and educational attainment as predictors of liberal social attitudes and political trust (2010, background): “…have focused on the liberalism–conservatism distinction (e.g.; Jost et al., 2003; Jost, 2006; Saucier, 2000), political views and trust (e.g. Bynner et al., 2003; Citrin &Muste, 1999; Dalton, 2004; 2005; Inglehart, 1997; Wiggins & Bynner, 1993), and human values (e.g. Schwartz & Boehnke, 2004).”
Navigating Social Roles in Pursuit of Important Goals: A Communal Goal Congruity Account of STEM Pursuits (2013, background): “Consistent with Schwarz’s work (Schwartz, 1992; Schwartz & Boehnke, 2004), benevolent values (i.e., helping directly) and universalist values (i.e., helping indirectly or broadly) certainly have in common the dimension of helping, but are distinct in the dimension of proximal or distal efforts.”
A Twenty-First Century Assessment of Values Across the Global Workforce (2011, methodology): “Our analyses using samples of business managers and professionals in 50 societies yielded mixed support for the internal consistency of the SVS values dimension measures articulated by Schwartz and his colleagues (e.g., Schwartz 1992, 1994a, b, 1999, 2006; Schwartz and Boehnke 2004; Schwartz and Sag”
Status Differentiation and the Protean Self: A Social-Cognitive Model of Unethical Behavior in Organizations (2011, methodology): “Similarly, Schwartz and Boehnke (2004) found that the moral value of benevolence, which includes related concepts such as honesty, forgiveness, and helpfulness, is almost exactly in opposition to the self-interested value of personal achievement which includes related concepts such as being…”
Brand Concepts as Representations of Human Values: Do Cultural Congruity and Compatibility between values Matter? (2012, background): “Schwartz and Boehnke (2004) provide empirical evidence for a model with 11 human value domains, resulting from dividing universalism further into two distinct values: social concerns (i.e., maintaining just relationships with others in society) and concerns with nature (i.e., preserving scarce…”
A cross-country and cross-time comparison of the human values measurements with the second round of the European Social Survey (2008, neutral): “Other studies find that by using a larger number of items, one can identify more values (e.g., Schmidt, Bamberg, Davidov, Herrmann, and Schwartz 2007; Schwartz and Boehnke 2004).”
Formation of Stakeholder Trust in Business and the Role of Personal Values (2015, neutral): “…and openness trust center-left parties that support social welfare, social justice, equality, and tolerance of diverse groups, even those that might disturb the conventional social order more so than center-right parties (Graham et al. 2009; Schwartz and Boehnke 2004; Schwartz et al. 2010).”
What levels of moral reasoning and values explain adherence to information security rules? An empirical study (2009, methodology): “Multidimensional structural analyses of the relationships between the single values of several cultures, including Finland, support the distinctiveness of the 10 value types, as well as the circular structure of relations among them (Verkasalo et al ., 1994; Schwartz & Boehnke, 2004; see Figure 1).”
On the merits of plant-based proteins for global food security: Marrying macro and micro perspectives (2011, background): “The first and the second scale measured two crucial aspects of sustainability that are subtypes of universalism values, (de Boer et al., 2007; Schwartz and Boehnke, 2004; Thøgersen and Ölander, 2002), namely the value of social justice (4 items, α=.”
An Overview of the Schwartz Theory of Basic Values (2012, methodology): “Only value items that have demonstrated near-equivalence of meaning across cultures in analyses using multi-dimensional scaling (SSA; Schwartz, 1992, 1994, 2006a) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA; Schwartz & Boehnke, 2004) are included in the indexes.”
Adolescents’ Worries about Environmental Risks: Subjective Well-being, Values, and Existential Dimensions (2005, result): “The result is also indirectly supported by a study that tested the structure of Schwartz's value survey (Schwartz & Boehnke 2004 ).”
The Psychology of Entrepreneurship (2012, background): “Besides, universal values like equality, a peaceful world, being in harmony with nature, social justice, freedom of opinion and protection of environment (Schwartz & Boehnke, 2004) that are popularized through globalism also existed in the values that are supported by entrepreneurs.”
Behavioral Manifestations of Modesty (2009, methodology): “The 57-item version of the SVS (Schwartz, 1992; Schwartz & Boehnke, 2004) was used to measure how important each value was to participants.”