How do We Learn to Trust? A Confirmatory Tetrad Analysis of the Sources of Generalized Trust

By Jennifer L. Glanville, Pamela Paxton. 2007

370 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/03a5e971ceecf16c4455d80e169dfb608c63998e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Stav Fainshmidt
2. Markus Freitag
3. P. Bauer
4. Matthew A. Andersson
5. Peter Ping Li

In Sociology and Political Science

1. P. Bauer
2. Stav Fainshmidt
3. Paul D. Johnson
4. M. Frazier
5. Markus Freitag
6. Matthew A. Andersson
7. Peter Ping Li

Citations in the corpus

• Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years? (2011, neutral): “This is a form of intermediary social capital, different from both the strong ties of the bonding social capital and the weak ties of the bridging one (Glanville & Paxton, 2007; Yosano & Hayashi, 2005).”
• Personality traits and the propensity to trust friends and strangers (2016, background): “In general, social trust can be described as an expectation that people will behave with good will, that they intend to honor their commitments, and that they will avoid harming others (Glanville & Paxton, 2007, p. 231; Barber, 1983; Yamagishi & Yamagishi, 1994)2.”
• Trust: An Integrative Review from a Person–Situation Perspective (2015, neutral): “…influence people’s trust behavior in comparable situations (Bicchieri, Duffy, & Tolle, 2004; Blair & Stout, 2001; Bohnet & Huck, 2004; Deutsch, 1962; Glanville & Paxton, 2007; Rotter, 1967, 1980; Snijders & Keren, 1999; Tullberg, 2008; Van Lange, Vinkhuyzen, & Posthuma, 2014; Yu et al., 2014),…”
• Dispositional Optimism and the Emergence of Social Network Diversity (2012, background): “Diverse community interactions and involvements can build up one’s sense of generalized trust (Glanville and Paxton 2007), and thus perhaps dispositional optimism as well.”
• Development and validation of a propensity to trust scale (2013, background): “This is consistent with the theoretical origins of propensity to trust as a general view of others, built over time as a mental model of abstract social interactions (Glanville & Paxton, 2007).”