Extracellular matrix rigidity governs smooth muscle cell motility in a biphasic fashion
By Shelly R. Peyton, A. Putnam. Journal of Cellular Physiology, 2005
678 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Cell Biology, Immunology and Allergy
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/aa96cd6e10dd8377576e561472b396d1fddcfaf6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Biomedical Engineering
- P. Janmey
- A. Engler
- Penelope C. Georges
- Ilya Levental
- K. Sengupta
- J. Solon
- Dennis E. Discher
- Sanjay Kumar
In Cell Biology
- P. Janmey
- A. Engler
- Ilya Levental
- Sanjay Kumar
- Penelope C. Georges
- K. Sengupta
- J. Solon
- Dennis E. Discher
In Immunology and Allergy
Citations in the corpus
- Feedback amplification of fibrosis through matrix stiffening and COX-2 suppression (2010, background): “Numerous studies link the Rho/ROCK pathway to matrix stiffness responses (Paszek et al., 2005; Peyton and Putnam, 2005; Assoian and Klein, 2008), although none have examined the interrelationship of stiffness, Rho/ROCK, and prostaglandin signaling.”
- Intrinsic extracellular matrix properties regulate stem cell differentiation. (2010, background): “, 2007), (2) changes in Rho activity (Peyton and Putnam, 2005), and (3) stretch activated calcium channels (Lo et al.”
- Viscoelastic retraction of single living stress fibers and its impact on cell shape, cytoskeletal organization, and extracellular matrix mechanics. (2006, methodology): “The dose of Y27632 used in this study has been shown to profoundly (and optimally) alter cell shape and cytoskeletal morphology (54), whole cell prestress (56), cell migration speed ( 55 ), and focal adhesion size and turnover (76) in multiple cell types, including endothelial cells (76).”
- Embryonic cardiomyocytes beat best on a matrix with heart-like elasticity: scar-like rigidity inhibits beating (2008, background): “The elasticity ( E ) of ECM is an ‘insoluble cue’ for many cells, influencing cell shape, protein expression and organization, as well as differentiation (Discher et al., 2005; Pelham and Wang, 1997; Peyton and Putnam, 2005).”
- The mechanical rigidity of the extracellular matrix regulates the structure, motility, and proliferation of glioma cells (2009, background): “the relationship depending strongly on cell type, degree of adhesion, and other factors (15, 25).”
- Fibroblast adaptation and stiffness matching to soft elastic substrates. (2007, background): “Motility of cultured myocytes also depends on substrate stiffness, with a maximal rate of motility found at intermediate stiffness between 21 kPa and 52 kPa depending on the density of adhesive ligand (16).”
- Mechanical Integration of Actin and Adhesion Dynamics in Cell Migration (2010, background): “The migration rate of many cell types is optimized at intermediate levels of adhesion, and modulating the density or mechanical compliance of the ECM alters migration speed in a biphasic fashion (Gaudet et al. 2003, Lo et al. 2000, Palecek et al. 1997, Pelham & Wang 1997, Peyton & Putnam 2005).”
- In situ Forming Injectable Hydrogels for Drug Delivery and Wound Repair (2018, positive): “It is now readily accepted that the mechanics of substrates impact the phenotype of cells cultured on them, and may induce changes in proliferation [76], motility [77], or differentiation [78].”
- Cell Responses to Surface and Architecture of Tissue Engineering Scaffolds (2011, background): “…pore size, pore shape, interconnectivity, specific surface area) (O'Brien & Gibson, 2005b) and mechanical properties (Engler & Discher, 2006; Peyton & Putnam, 2005) have been shown to significantly influence cell behaviors such as adhesion, growth and differentiation, and to affect the…”