Making internalization theory good for practice: the essence of Alan Rugman’s contributions to international business

172 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Global, Local, or Regional? The Locus of MNE Strategies (2016, unknown): “The above analysis of regional strategy fits well with the RBV component of internalization theory, which points to the limits of international diversification (Narula and Verbeke, 2015).”
The Social Responsibility of International Business: From Ethics and the Environment to CSR and Sustainable Development (2016, unknown): “…& Pant, 2010), global/regional/local firm-specific advantages and strategies (Kolk, 2010c; Kolk, Lindeque, & Van den Buuse, 2014a; Poisson-de Haro & Bitektine, 2015; Narula & Verbeke, 2015) and their potential transferability across borders (cf. Holtbrügge & Dögl, 2012; Verbeke, 2009).”
The structural reshaping of globalization: Implications for strategic sectors, profiting from innovation, and the multinational enterprise (2019, background): “During this time, ‘‘[t]he idea of complex, cross-border configurations and the MNE as an integral part of the socio-economic milieu with a variety of dispersed activities was more science fiction than fact’’ (Cuervo-Cazurra & Narula, 2015: 6).”
Family firm internationalization: heritage assets and the impact of bifurcation bias (2018, unknown): “In its most contemporary iteration, internalization theory combines TCE, resource based and entrepreneurial dimensions (Buckley and Casson, 1976; Narula and Verbeke, 2015).”