Fundamental dimensions of subjective state in performance settings: task engagement, distress, and worry.

By Gerald Matthews, Sian E. Campbell, S. Falconer, L. Joyner, Janice Huggins, K. Gilliland, Rebecca A. Grier, Joel S. Warm. Emotion, 2002

599 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/aa1fd827e37f9f69917c42fe841a6fa4215ea6bf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Employee, manage thyself: The potentially negative implications of expecting employees to behave proactively (2010, background): “In particular, research in the area of energetic resources (e.g., Kahneman, 1973; Matthews et al., 2002; Meijman & Mulder, 1998) indicates that demanding tasks do not always cause stress.”
Vigilance Requires Hard Mental Work and Is Stressful (2008, methodology): “…multidimensional framework for understanding transient states of mood, arousal, and fatigue, Matthews and colleagues (Matthews et al., 1999; Matthews et al., 2002) developed the Dundee Stress State Questionnaire (DSSQ) to assess ways in which stress may be experienced as disturbances in…”
Fundamentals of physiological computing (2009, methodology): “Task Engagement was defined as an ''effortful striving towards task goals " , which increased during a demanding cognitive task and declined when participants performed a sustained and monotonous vigilance task (Matthews et al., 2002).”
TARGET ARTICLES: "Seven Myths About Emotional Intelligence" (2004, methodology): “There are further criteria for deciding whether a construct conforms to standards for an intelligence (Mayer et al., 1999). In general, studies of the MEIS and MSCEIT do meet criteria corresponding to convergent and divergent vahdity. Mayer et al. (1999) showed that the MEIS correlated with verbal i”
The influence of performance feedback on goal-setting and mental effort regulation (2009, methodology): “Additional subjective measures of state including motivation, and control and confidence were measured using subscales from the Dundee Stress State Questionnaire (DSSQ: Matthews et al. 1999, 2002).”
The Faces of Engagement: Automatic Recognition of Student Engagementfrom Facial Expressions (2014, background): “Finally, we investigate whether human and automated engagement judgments correlate with task performance.”
Cerebral Hemodynamics and Vigilance Performance (2009, background): “In addition, a recently completed study in our lab (Reinerman et al., 2006) has shown that hemovelocity responses to a short high-information processing test battery, when coupled with a measure of task engagement provided by the Dundee Stress State Questionnaire (Matthews et al., 2002), predict sub”
Validation of a Short Stress State Questionnaire (2004, methodology): “Second, the confidence and control items loaded on the Engagement factor, not Distress as in Matthews et al. (2002).”
PROFILING TASK STRESS WITH THE DUNDEE STRESS STATE QUESTIONNAIRE (2013, methodology): “In terms of Hockey’s (1997) control theory, distress may be associated with a ‘strain’ mode as the person adapts to cognitive overload, and loss of engagement with adaptation through lowering performance goals (Matthews et al., 2002).”