Language Contact and Change
By Seemita Mohanty. 2010
116 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a9ee52a04b0cef9422ca06e6bf76852701742f1c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- S. Montrul
- Maria Polinsky
- Alejandro Cuza
- Gregory Scontras
- Noelia Sánchez-Walker
- Ji-hye Kim
- Jürgen M. Meisel
- James Hye-Suk Yoon
Citations in the corpus
- Understanding heritage languages (2019, background): “…is often that heritage speakers struggle with aspectual morphology; by comparison, difficulty with tense is seldom attested (see Montrul, 2016; Silva-Corvalán, 1994, and further references therein on aspect in heritage Spanish; Laleko, 2010, on aspect in heritage Russian; Jia & Bayley, 2008,…”
- Bilingual language acquisition and theories of diachronic change: Bilingualism as cause and effect of grammatical change* (2010, background): “This may be the situation in the case of heritage languages, see Montrul (2004), Silva-Corvalán (1994), among others.”
- Crosslinguistic influence at the syntax proper: Interrogative subject–verb inversion in heritage Spanish (2013, background): “Heritage language learners are second- or third-generation immigrants who were raised in a home environment where a heritage language was spoken in addition to the majority language (e.g. Montrul, 2004; Potowski, Jegerski, & Morgan-Short, 2009; Silva-Corvalán, 1994).”
- Differential Object Marking in Child and Adult Spanish Heritage Speakers (2013, background): “Heritage speakers are second-generation immigrants in sociolinguistic terms (Silva-Corvalán 1994): the children of first-generation immigrants who were either born in the United States or immigrated in early childhood with their parents.”
- Knowledge of tense-aspect and mood in Spanish heritage speakers (2009, background): “Studies of adult early bilinguals have reported that tense-aspect and mood are vulnerable areas in Spanish heritage speakers (Silva-Corvalán, 1994; Montrul, 2002, 2007).”
- Binding Interpretations of Anaphors by Korean Heritage Speakers (2009, background): “, LDAs are simple, while local anaphors are complex), Song et al. (1997) investigated whether Korean monolinguals (ages 2–8 years) and early Korean-English bilingual children (ages 3– 8 years) can learn this putative universal (i.”
- Current Issues in Heritage Language Acquisition (2010, background): “The subjunctive mood (in both present and past) is poorly controlled by Spanish heritage speakers in production and in comprehension (Montrul, 2007; Silva-Corvalán, 1994), and so is the conditional (Silva-Corvalán).”