Binding Interpretations of Anaphors by Korean Heritage Speakers

By Ji-hye Kim, S. Montrul, James Hye-Suk Yoon. 2009

98 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f472a3ca4c730061bffa61b83c71aeb9f8ca251b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Maria Polinsky
2. Gregory Scontras
3. S. Montrul
4. Alejandro Cuza

In Language and Linguistics

1. Maria Polinsky
2. S. Montrul
3. Gregory Scontras
4. Jason Rothman
5. Noelia Sánchez-Walker
6. Alejandro Cuza
7. Greville Corbett
8. A. Sorace

Citations in the corpus

• Understanding heritage languages (2019, methodology): “Kim et al. (2009) used a truth-value judgment task to assess interpretation preferences in monolingual speakers of Korean, Korean–English bilinguals who learned English in late childhood, and early Korean–English bilinguals who were born in the U.S. (i.e., what we have been considering as heritage…”
• Current Issues in Heritage Language Acquisition (2010, background): “Kim, Montrul, and Yoon (2009) found that longdistance preferences were affected in adult Korean heritage speakers.”