The impact of environmental regulation on competitiveness in the German manufacturing industry—a comparison with other countries of the European Union

By U. Triebswetter, D. Hitchens. 2005

124 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Environmental Engineering, Marketing, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a9b51d91a1195b3624619e6cc550e5328126b8ca

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Environmental Engineering

1. Kathryn Haynes
2. Keith R. Skene
3. Ramakrishnan Ramanathan
4. A. Murray

In Marketing

1. Kathryn Haynes
2. Abby Ghobadian
3. A. Black
4. David Gallear
5. Keith R. Skene
6. Ramakrishnan Ramanathan
7. A. Murray
8. A. Doyon

In Strategy and Management

1. Kathryn Haynes
2. Abby Ghobadian
3. A. Black
4. David Gallear
5. Keith R. Skene
6. Ramakrishnan Ramanathan
7. A. Murray
8. Peng Zhou

Citations in the corpus

• Environmental regulations, innovation and firm performance: A revisit of the Porter hypothesis (2017, background): “, 2007), while others found no discernible relationship (Triebswetter and Hitchens, 2005).”
• How environmental regulations affect innovation in the Australian oil and gas industry: going beyond the Porter Hypothesis (2014, unknown): “A study on German manufacturing showed no evidence that the intense existing regulatory structure impeded firms ability to compete internationally (Triebswetter and Hitchens, 2005).”
• The Circular Economy: An Interdisciplinary Exploration of the Concept and Application in a Global Context (2015, methodology): “It was the advent of the closed loop economy, first presented in the Spaceship Earth analogy of Boulding (1966), and later developed by Stahel and Reday-Mulvey (1976), that became influential upon German and Japanese policy of the 1980s and 90s (Triebswetter and Hitchens 2005; Moriguchi 2007; Bilite”