Environmental regulations, innovation and firm performance: A revisit of the Porter hypothesis

By Ramakrishnan Ramanathan, Qile He, A. Black, Abby Ghobadian, David Gallear. 2017

497 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Part of the research for this paper was supported by funding from Nottingham Innovative Manufacturing Research Centre and the University of Bedfordshire Business and Management Research Institute.

Subfields: Building and Construction, Marketing, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/795f28f750c07f9c89b2f2b62731712a3b56a48c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Building and Construction

1. Y. Wolde‐Rufael
2. Yongmei Bentley
3. Ramakrishnan Ramanathan
4. Usha Ramanathan

In Marketing

1. Y. Wolde‐Rufael
2. Eyob Mulat Weldemeskel
3. Yongmei Bentley
4. Ramakrishnan Ramanathan
5. Usha Ramanathan

In Strategy and Management

1. Yongmei Bentley
2. Usha Ramanathan
3. Ramakrishnan Ramanathan
4. Peng Zhou
5. Beng Wah Ang

Citations in the corpus

• Environmental policy stringency, renewable energy consumption and CO2 emissions: Panel cointegration analysis for BRIICTS countries (2020, background): “…to the Porter Hypothesis (Porter and van der Linde 1995), a well-thought environmental policy can promote innovations in clean energy which helps firms to break away from polluting technologies to environmentally friendly technologies (Dechezleprêtre and Sato 2017; Ramanathan et al. 2017).”