Endogenous Bone Marrow MSCs Are Dynamic, Fate-Restricted Participants in Bone Maintenance and Regeneration

By D. Park, J. Spencer, Bong Ihn Koh, Tatsuya Kobayashi, Joji Fujisaki, T. Clemens, Charles P. Lin, H. Kronenberg, D. Scadden. Cell Stem Cell, 2012

618 citations recorded by the source corpus.

SUMMARY Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) commonly defined by in vitro functions have entered clinical application despite little definition of their function in residence. Here, we report genetic pulse-chase experiments that define osteoblastic cells as short-lived and nonreplicative, requiring replenishment from bone-marrow-derived, Mx1+ stromal cells with “MSC” features. These cells respond to tissue stress and migrate to sites of injury, supplying new osteoblasts during fracture healing. Single cell transplantation yielded progeny that both preserve progenitor function and differentiate into osteoblasts, producing new bone. They are capable of local and systemic translocation and serial transplantation. While these cells meet current definitions of MSCs in vitro, they are osteolineage restricted in vivo in growing and adult animals. Therefore, bone-marrow-derived MSCs may be a heterogeneous population with the Mx1+ population, representing a highly dynamic and stress responsive stem/progenitor cell population of fate-restricted potential that feeds the high cell replacement demands of the adult skeleton.

Subfields: Genetics, Hematology, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a9a423aab53ffacfa3f172d1e81c4442a8fed7b9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

  1. A. Keating
  2. W. Fibbe
  3. Maria Ester Bernardo
  4. S. Morrison
  5. T. Stappenbeck

In Hematology

  1. W. Fibbe
  2. A. Keating
  3. S. Morrison

In Molecular Biology

  1. A. Keating
  2. S. Morrison
  3. G. Karsenty
  4. T. Stappenbeck

Citations in the corpus