The Mind in the Middle.

By F. Matthews. 2006

98 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Committing to implementation intentions: Attention and memory effects for selected situational cues (2012, background): “Pronunciation latencies were screened for outliers; latencies of less than 400 ms and more than 2,000 ms were excluded (see e.g., Smith 2010; Bargh and Chartrand 2000).”
Seeing black: race, crime, and visual processing. (2004, methodology): “Our priming technique followed closely the paradigm outlined by Bargh and Chartrand (2000).”
Materialistic cues make us miserable: A meta‐analysis of the experimental evidence for the effects of materialism on individual and societal well‐being (2020, result): “We, therefore, turn to prior research on value priming (Maio, Pakizeh, Cheung, & Rees, 2009) based on previous work on priming (Bargh & Chartrand, 2000) and values structure (Schwartz, 1992).”
The mediating role of positive and negative affect in the situational motivation-performance relationship (2013, methodology): “Specifically, using an experimental design we induced autonomous motivation (or a control group condition) using paraliminal priming (e.g., Bargh and Chartrand 2000).”