Committing to implementation intentions: Attention and memory effects for selected situational cues

By Anja Achtziger, Ute C. Bayer, Peter M. Gollwitzer. 2012

93 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, General Decision Sciences, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cb323d08b777d37ff84fd31c41a88fca709ab5c0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Peter M. Gollwitzer
2. G. Oettingen
3. P. Sheeran
4. Anja Achtziger
5. Andreas Kappes
6. Thomas Llewelyn Webb
7. Roy F. Baumeister
8. Ute C. Bayer

In General Decision Sciences

1. Peter M. Gollwitzer
2. G. Oettingen
3. Andreas Kappes

In Sociology and Political Science

1. G. Oettingen
2. Peter M. Gollwitzer
3. Anja Achtziger
4. P. Sheeran
5. Ute C. Bayer
6. Kentaro Fujita

Citations in the corpus

• Planning promotes goal striving. (2011, background): “Using a dichotic listening paradigm, Achtziger, Bayer, and Gollwitzer (2010) found that words describing the anticipated critical situation were highly disruptive to focused attention in implementation-intention participants compared to mere goal-intention participants (i.e., the shadowing…”
• Weakness of the will: Is a quick fix possible? (2014, background): “Achtziger et al. (2012) observed in a cued recall experiment that participants more effectively recalled the available situational opportunities to attain a set goal given that these opportunities had been specified in if– then links (i.e., in implementation intentions); this effect showed up no…”