Need support and behavioural regulations for exercise among exercise referral scheme clients: The mediating role of psychological need satisfaction.
By D. Markland, V. Tobin. 2010
228 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Safety Research, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a883254b9b8d244ab93cfc785afa923cdcba9ce5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
- Maarten Vansteenkiste
- Richard M. Ryan
- Nikos Ntoumanis
- J. Reeve
- Bart Soenens
- Edward L. Deci
- J. Duda
- A. van den Broeck
In Safety Research
- Maarten Vansteenkiste
- Richard M. Ryan
- Nikos Ntoumanis
- J. Reeve
- Bart Soenens
- Edward L. Deci
- L. Haerens
- Nathalie Aelterman
In Social Psychology
- Maarten Vansteenkiste
- Richard M. Ryan
- J. Reeve
- Bart Soenens
- Edward L. Deci
- Nikos Ntoumanis
- L. Haerens
- Nathalie Aelterman
Citations in the corpus
- Exercise, physical activity, and self-determination theory: A systematic review (2012, methodology): “No associations with moderately intense PA. Teixeira et al.InternationalJournalof BehavioralN utrition and PhysicalA ctivity 2012,9:78 Page 6 of 30 http://w w w .ijbnpa.org/content/9/1/78 Table 1 Description of reviewed studies (Continued) Moreno et al., 2007 [89] Cross-sectional 561 (53) Healthy ad”
- Self-Determination Theory Applied to Health Contexts (2012, background): “…professionalism and biomedical ethics, an autonomy-supportive health care climate (e.g., taking the perspectives of patients, providing choices; Markland & Tobin, 2010; Williams, 2002) facilitates satisfaction of the basic psychological needs and respects patient choice, even when a patient…”
- Conceptualizing and testing a new tripartite measure of coach interpersonal behaviors (2019, methodology): “With regard to the first approach, researchers have presented a onefactor model of “need support” that includes items assessing the support of all three needs (e.g., Health Care Climate Questionnaire, HCCQ; Williams, Grow, Freedman, Ryan, & Deci, 1996; Need Support for Exercise Scale, NSE; Markland ”
- The development of the five mini-theories of self-determination theory: an historical overview, emerging trends, and future directions (2010, background): “In the case the pursuit is autonomously regulated, need satisfaction may follow. However, an ego-involved or reactively driven pursuit of need satisfaction is less likely to engender maximal need satisfaction for a number of reasons. First, when needs are thwarted, people may become sensitive to env”
- On Psychological Growth and Vulnerability: Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction and Need Frustration as a Unifying Principle (2013, background): “Furthermore, satisfaction of basic psychological needs has been established as an antecedent of greater internalization (e.g., Markland & Tobin, 2010).”
- SELF-DETERMINATION THEORY APPLIED TO HEALTH CONTEXTS: A META-ANALYSIS (2012, background): “…professionalism and biomedical ethics, an autonomy-supportive health care climate (e.g., taking the perspectives of patients, providing choices; Markland & Tobin, 2010; Williams, 2002) facilitates satisfaction of the basic psychological needs and respects patient choice, even when a patient…”
- Fostering Personal Meaning and Self-relevance: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective on Internalization (2018, background): “Consistent with the presumed differential role of the psychological needs for the fostering of different types of regulation, Markland and Tobin (2010) reported in a sample of female exercisers that experiences of autonomy and social assimilation related negatively to external regulation, while…”
- Basic psychological need theory: Advancements, critical themes, and future directions (2020, unknown): “2015; Markland and Tobin 2010).”
- Autonomy and autonomy disturbances in self-development and psychopathology: Research on motivation, attachment, and clinical process (2016, unknown): “Consistent with this idea, Markland and Tobin (2010) showed that the satisfaction of the three needs maps in theoretically meaningful ways to the different types of regulation for exercising.”
- Testing and integrating self-determination theory and self-efficacy theory in a physical activity context (2012, unknown): “This direct effect has also been found for intrinsic motivation (Markland & Tobin, 2010).”
- Need satisfaction and need frustration as distinct and potentially co-occurring constructs: Need profiles examined in physical education and sport (2019, background): “…occur when autonomy, competence, and relatedness needs are satisfied and individuals engage in activities because they enjoy them or find them inherently interesting (i.e., intrinsic motivation) or valuable (i.e., identified regulation; e.g., Markland and Tobin 2010; Milyavskaya and Koestner 2011).”
- Motivating voluntary compliance to behavioural restrictions: Self-determination theory–based checklist of principles for COVID-19 and other emergency communications (2021, background): “Apart from its critical role in individuals’ mental health, need satisfaction also contributes to internalisation of the various values, goals, and practices (Markland & Tobin, 2010; Milyavskaya et al., 2014).”
- Capturing autonomy, competence, and relatedness at work: Construction and initial validation of the Work‐related Basic Need Satisfaction scale (2010, background): “Such satisfaction is, however, not guaranteed as feeling pressured to engage in a work activity is not necessarily accompanied by feelings of effectiveness and interpersonal connection (Markland & Tobin, 2010).”