Interpreting indefinites: An experimental study of children's language comprehension

By I. Krämer. 2000

96 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a833221a760fcffa72956f2692d707d5bc1dea93

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Language and Linguistics

1. Jeffrey Lidz
2. Eric Reuland
3. Julien Musolino
4. Holger Hopp
5. Ian Cunnings
6. Caitlin E. Coughlin
7. Annie Tremblay
8. J. Hulstijn

Citations in the corpus

• Primitives of Binding (2001, background): “33 Krämer (2000) investigates the acquisition of indefinites.”
• The syntax–discourse interface in near-native L2 acquisition: Off-line and on-line performance* (2009, background): “These correspondences are acquired late in child L1 development (e.g. Avrutin, 1999; Krämer, 2000; Unsworth, 2005), not least because they necessitate the integration of syntactic, morphological and pragmatic knowledge.”
• Why children aren't universally successful with quantification (2006, background): “…and Lynch 2000; Brooks and Braine 1996; Linguistics 44–4 (2006), 817–852 DOI 10.1515/LING.2006.026 0024–3949/06/0044–0817 6 Walter de Gruyter Crain et al. 1996; Crain 2000; Drozd 2000; Musolino et al. 2000; Krämer 2000; Lidz and Musolino 2002; Papafragou and Musolino 2003; among many others).”