Primitives of Binding

By Eric Reuland. Linguistic Inquiry, 2001

492 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cultural Studies, Language and Linguistics, Philosophy

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9fb0d67e3ff741a8b810025fd16b58865ccb4664

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cultural Studies

1. I. Landau
2. A. Neeleman
3. Carlo Cecchetto
4. Claudia Felser
5. H. D. Koot
6. Ian Cunnings
7. Ž. Bošković
8. C. Donati

In Language and Linguistics

1. I. Landau
2. C. Donati
3. A. Neeleman
4. Carlo Cecchetto
5. Claudia Felser
6. H. D. Koot
7. Ian Cunnings
8. Ž. Bošković

In Philosophy

1. I. Landau
2. A. Neeleman
3. Carlo Cecchetto
4. Claudia Felser
5. H. D. Koot
6. Ian Cunnings
7. Ž. Bošković
8. Kenneth Wexler

Citations in the corpus

• On the Locality and Motivation of Move and Agree: An Even More Minimal Theory (2007, background): “The hypothesis has often been appealed to in the Minimalist Program, its precise implementation depending on the approach to covert dependencies at the time (see, e.g., Chomsky 1993, 1995b, in press, Lasnik 1999, Reuland 2001).”
• The Configurational Matrix (2002, background): “…phenomena such as logophoric relations (Reinhart and Reuland 1991, 1993), coreference (Reinhart 1983, 1996), and bound variable anaphora (Reuland 2001).2 We will not discuss control, but differences between obligatory and nonobligatory control also demonstrate the contrast between…”
• Comprehension of reflexive and personal pronouns in children with autism: A syntactic or pragmatic deficit? (2012, background): “It has been argued that other theories of binding, such as Reinhart and Reuland (1993), or Reuland (2001), may be better equipped to deal with the different types of reflexive elements in these languages than the standard binding theory of Chomsky (1986; for details, see Perovic, 2004, 2006, Ring &…”
• On Labeling: Principle C and Head Movement (2010, background): “Chomsky (1993), Hornstein (2006), and Reuland (2001), among others, offer minimalist reformulation of Principles A and B. Kayne (2005) and Schlenker (2005) try to reduce Principle C from more primitive conditions.”
• The Explicit Syntax of Implicit Arguments (2010, background): “Rather than surveying various implementations of this intuition, I will simply follow one influential school of thought on these matters, represented in Reinhart and Reuland 1993, Reuland and Reinhart 1995, Reinhart 2000, and especially Reuland 2001.”
• The role of working memory in the processing of reflexives (2013, background): “Indeed, the question of whether binding Principle A also applies to cases when the reflexive and antecedent are not co-arguments has been the matter of some debate in theoretical linguistics (for discussion, see Pollard & Sag, 1992; Reinhart & Reuland, 1993; Reuland, 2001).”