Negative symbolic consumption and consumers’ drive for self‐esteem: The case of the fashion industry

By Emma Banister, Margaret K Hogg. 2004

378 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a7a574ae0587f84c1c3c5da637fd8cdc717b71a1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Marketing

In Museology

Citations in the corpus

Determinants of fashion store personality: a consumer perspective (2009, methodology): “Female participants dominate the sample as their interest in fashion is characteristic (Evans, 1993) and clothing for men is often bought by their partners (Banister and Hogg, 2004). The 34-item store personality scale recently developed by d’Astous and Lévesque (2003) was used as a starting point, ”
Measuring psychographics to assess purchase intention and willingness to pay (2012, background): “This is exemplified through consumers’ propensity to purchase items that reflect a positive self-image (Dunning, 2007; Banister and Hogg, 2004; Sedikides et al., 2007).”
Anti‐brand communities, negotiation of brand meaning, and the learning process: The case of Wal‐Mart (2010, background): “Passive resistance includes forms of frugality (Connolly and Prothero 2003; Lastovicka et al. 1999), brand avoidance (Banister and Hogg 2004; Lee, Conroy, and Motion 2009), voluntary simplification (Leonard-Barton 1981; Zavestoski 2002), and voluntary dispossession (Cherrier and Murray 2007).”
What we know about anticonsumption: An attempt to nail jelly to the wall (2020, background): “Finally, researchers stress that knowing what consumers do not want is just as valuable as knowing what they want (Banister & Hogg, 2004).”
Mapping symbolic (anti-) consumption (2009, methodology): “…al., 1997), and avoid and distinguish/distance themselves from brands with user stereotypes which they associate with their negative undesired self (Banister and Hogg, 2004; Ogilvie, 1987; Sirgy et al., 1997), leading to disidentification from avoidance (Lee et al., 2009-this issue; see also…”
To Be or Not Be? The Influence of Dissociative Reference Groups on Consumer Preferences (2006, background): “Moreover, research suggests that consumers will avoid products with negative symbolic implications (Banister & Hogg, 2004), exhibit negative attitudes toward lifestyles they wish to avoid (Lowrey, Englis, Shavitt, & Solomon, 2001), and demonstrate who they are by avoiding particular products (Muniz…”