The choice of partners in R&D cooperation: An empirical analysis of Spanish firms

By Nieves Arranz, J. Fdez. de Arroyabe. 2008

307 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Virtual Teams: A Literature Review (2009, unknown): “(Arranz and Arroyabe, 2008) point out that geographical dimension is not a variable that impacts s ubs tantially on the typology and objectives of R&D cooperation, in contrast with the results highlighted in the literature review that they have done.”
Determinants of Collaboration in European R&D Networks: Empirical Evidence from a Discrete Choice Model (2011, background): “There is some recent evidence from empirical studies that public funding (in this case, via the EU-FPs) exerts a major impact on inter-firm collaboration and scientific performance (Arranz and Arroyabe, 2008 ; Busom and Fernandez-Ribas, 2008 ; Defazio et al.”
Open, Semi-Open and Closed Innovators: Towards an Explanation of Degree of Openness (2010, background): “, 2001 ; Miotti and Sachwald, 2003 ; Arranz and Fernandez de Arroyabe, 2008 ), while Becker and Dietz ( 2004 ) find the reverse and Tether ( 2002 ) finds an absence of any influence.”
Returns to alliance portfolio diversity : The relative effects of partner diversity on firm’s innovative performance and productivity (2014, background): “Both practitioners and scholars agree that technological alliances, aimed at a purposeful exchange of technological resources or joint R&D is a ubiquitous phenomenon (Contractor & Lorange, 2002).”