Automatic and Controlled Processes in Stereotype Priming

By Irene V. Blair, Mahzarin R. Banaji. 1996

Subfields: Cognitive Science & Psychology, Social Sciences & Humanities

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Science & Psychology

In Social Sciences & Humanities

Citations in the corpus

Queens Are Powerful Too: Mitigating Gender Bias in Dialogue Generation (2019, background): “of gender stereotype priming (Blair and Banaji, 1996; Steele and Ambady, 2006; Oswald, 2008; Derks et al., 2011; Verhaeghen et al., 2011).”
Priorities in social categories. (2010, background): “Further, exposure to race-, gender-, and age-related cues can bias subsequent behavior even when researchers take steps to minimize controlled processing (Blair & Banaji, 1996; Cesario, Plaks, & Higgins, 2006; Donders, Correll, & Wittenbrink, 2008; Wittenbrink, Judd, & Park, 1997).”
To Disclose or Not to Disclose? Status Distance and Self-Disclosure in Diverse Environments (2009, background): “Status distance as a concept has been discussed by researchers such as Blau (1977) and McPherson and Smith-Lovin (1987) and captures the level of difference between individuals with respect to the status they hold.”
Best laid plans: Effects of goals on accessibility bias and cognitive control in race-based misperceptions of weapons (2002, background): “The extent to which unconscious and automatic cognitions are controllable is currently a matter of lively discussion (e.g., Bargh & Gollwitzer, 1994; Blair & Banaji, 1996; Devine, 1989).”
Intersectional Oppression: Multiple Stigmatized Identities and Perceptions of Invisibility, Discrimination, and Stereotyping (2018, background): “Over time, stereotype use is integrated into general cognition and occurs fluidly and automatically (Blair & Banaji, 1996; Devine, 1989).”
Prejudice and perception: the role of automatic and controlled processes in misperceiving a weapon. (2001, background): “Several recent experiments have yielded results suggesting that processes seemingly under intentional control may influence responses at SOAs shorter than 500 ms. Blair and Banaji (1996) investigated the activation of gender stereotypes .”
Moderators of the relationship between implicit and explicit evaluation. (2005, background): “Much of the early empirical evidence comparing implicit and explicit measures suggested that they elicit distinct, even conflicting , evaluative responses (e.g., Banaji & Hardin, 1996; Blair & Banaji, 1996; Bosson, Swann, & Pennebaker, 2000; Devine, 1989; Fazio et al., 1995; Greenwald et al., 1998).”
A justification-suppression model of the expression and experience of prejudice. (2003, background): “…as measured by the Implicit Association Test (IAT; Greenwald, McGhee, & Schwartz, 1998 ) have proven malleable to different goal situations (Blair & Banaji, 1996), instruction sets (Blair, Ma, & Lenton, 2001), and other environmental manipulations (Karpinski & Hilton, 2001; see also…”
Determinants of Gender Essentialism in College Students (2008, background): “…gender stereotypes and attitudes can be assessed by means of response speed on a simple judgment task (e.g., how quickly a participant judges that “John” is male, when following the word “delicate” vs. when following the word “rough”; Blair and Banaji 1996; see also Greenwald and Banaji 1995).”
The perception–behavior expressway: Automatic effects of social perception on social behavior. (2001, background): “Research shows that upon activation of a social category (e.g., elderly), associated stereotypic traits (e.g., slow, forgetful) are also activated (Blair & Banaji, 1996; Devine, 1989; Dijksterhuis & van Knippenberg, 1996; Dovidio, Evans & Tyler, 1986; Macrae, Stangor & Milne, 1994).”
THE GO/NO-GO ASSOCIATION TASK (2001, unknown): “As pointed out by Bosson et al. (2000), the reliability of implicit measures is far below typical standards for their explicit counterparts.”
Cognitive Load and Classroom Teaching: The Double-Edged Sword of Automaticity (2007, background): “Similarly, Blair and Banaji (1996) found that extraneous cognitive load led to a higher frequency of biased responses during sentence completion tasks.”
The Emotional Unconscious (2000, background): “In general, Blair and Banaji (1996) found a gender-specific priming effect: judgments were faster when the gender connotations of the prime were congruent with the gender category of the name.”