Positive reciprocity and intentions in trust games

By Kevin McCabe, Mary L. Rigdon, Vernon L. Smith. 2003

663 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Decision Sciences, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a63c010702604808b13eeca1e32a610cd2c678f2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Decision Sciences

In Safety Research

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Mine and yours: Property rights in dictator games (2008, result): “This is consistent with results in Berg et al. (1995) and McCabe et al. (2003) :”
A theory of reciprocity (2006, background): “The fact that fair intentions play a major role for the perception of kindness is suggested by several experimental studies (Brandts and Sola, 2001; Falk et al., 2003; McCabe et al., 2003; Offerman, 2002; Greenberg and Frisch, 1972; Goranson and Berkowitz, 1966).”
Does Religion Promote Trust? The Role of Signaling, Reputation, and Punishment (2005, background): “4 For instance, most economic experiments aimed at measuring trust assume, consistent with Bacharach and Gambetta’s definition, that the Truster can potentially benefit from a trusting relationship if the Trustee is trustworthy (e.g., Barclay 2004; Berg et al. 1995; Bohnet and Croson 2004; Croson an”
Strategic conversation (2012, background): “Our framework thus invites extensive empirical work on strategic conversations, something we plan to do.”
Indirect Reciprocity in Cyclical Networks - An Experimental Study - (2005, background): “(1994), Rapoport (1997), and McCabe et al. (2000), who observe attempts to reciprocate occurring more frequently in sequential play than in simultaneous play.”
Testing guilt aversion (2010, background): “For example, McCabe, Rigdon, and Smith (2003) find that trustees are substantially more likely to reward trust if trustors’ outside (no-trust) options are relatively attractive.17 Such trustee behavior is difficult to reconcile not only with standard selfish preferences, but also with most models…”
Cooperation over finite horizons: a theory and experiments (2011, neutral): “McCabe et al. (2003) find supporting evidence for this, reporting that trustees in a trust game returned a greater amount of money if the truster could actually decide to trust or not, compared to a condition where the truster was forced to “trust” the trustee.14 13We note that although the above…”
Public Goods Provision and Sanctioning in Privileged Groups (2007, background): “Since intentions have been shown to matter (Falk et al., 2000; McCabe et al., 2003; Charness and Levine, 2006) such ambiguity may make low-benefit subjects unwilling to reciprocate high contributions of high-benefit subjects, and high-benefit subjects unwilling to punish low contributions of low-ben”
The Economics of Fairness, Reciprocity and Altruism--Experimental Evidence and New Theories. (2005, background): “54 In the absence of the evidence provided by Falk et al. (2000a) and McCabe et al. (2000), one would have to conclude that the motive to reward good intentions or fair types is (at best) of minor importance.”
Computing and Applying Trust in Web-based Social Networks (2005, background): “…or digital signatures (Ansper, et al., 2001); a measure of the quality of a peer in P2P systems (Lee, et al., 2003); a factor in game theory (McCabe et al., 2003); a model for agent interactions (Jonker, Treur, 1999); a gauge of attack-resistance (Wallach, et al., 6 1997);a component of…”