Mine and yours: Property rights in dictator games

410 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Dictator games: a meta study (2011, background): “…2008; Koch and Normann 2008; Korenok, Millner et al. 2008; List and Cherry 2008; Mohlin and Johannesson 2008; Oberholzer-Gee and Eichenberger 2008; Oxoby and Spraggon 2008; Slonim and Garbarino 2008; Stephen and Pham 2008; Swope, Cadigan et al. 2008; van der Merwe and Burns 2008; Yamagishi and…”
Anonymity in the Dictator Game Revisited (2012, background): “…receive “windfall” gains (Arkes et al., 1994; Hoffman et al., 1994; Cappelen et al., 2007; Cherry, 2001; Cherry et al., 2002; List and Cherry, 2008; Oxoby and Spraggon, 2008), when there is a large social distance between proposers and recipients (Hoffman et al., 1996; Bohnet and Frey, 1999;…”
Do Women Behave More Reciprocally than Men? Gender Differences in Real Effort Dictator Games (2012, background): “The main di erence in our study is that we focus on gender di erences in reciprocal behavior.4 Related is also Oxoby and Spraggon (2008), who demonstrate that dictators make signi cantly lower o ers when recipients did a real-e ort task.”
Fair Is Not Fair Everywhere (2015, background): “…people will often try to restore equity by redistributing resources in proportion to work contribution even when doing so means that they receive the smaller share (Almås, Cappelen, Sørensen, & Tungodden, 2010; Frohlich, Oppenheimer, & Kurki, 2004; Miller & Komorita, 1995; Oxoby & Spraggon, 2008).”