Indirect Reciprocity in Cyclical Networks - An Experimental Study -

By Ben Greiner, Maria Vittoria Levati. 2005

129 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5a4559f45dd7af6a5d5620bd5af1676bbf21c0a7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Matthias Sutter
2. Luca Stanca
3. Maria Vittoria Levati
4. W. Gueth
5. E. Heijden
6. Martin G. Kocher
7. Roman M. Sheremeta

In Safety Research

1. Matthias Sutter
2. E. Heijden
3. Maria Vittoria Levati
4. W. Gueth
5. Luca Stanca
6. Martin G. Kocher
7. Stefan T. Trautmann
8. John S. Ahlquist

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Matthias Sutter
2. Luca Stanca
3. Maria Vittoria Levati
4. W. Gueth
5. E. Heijden
6. Martin G. Kocher

Citations in the corpus

• Leading by example with and without exclusion power in voluntary contribution experiments (2007, background): “15Somewhat related to this possible extension, Greiner and Levati (2005) show that sequential moves in a trust game with a cyclical network structure (where the first player interacts with the second, the second with the third, ... and the last one with the first) increase cooperation in comparison…”
• Measuring Indirect Reciprocity: Whose Back Do We Scratch? (2009, background): “…evidence on indirect reciprocity focuses on iterated interactions, where there can be a strategic incentive to reciprocate indirectly (e.g. Wedekind and Milinski, 2000, Engelmann and Fischbacher, 2003, Seinen and Schram, 2004, Bolton, Katok and Ockenfels, 2004, Greiner and Levati, 2005).”