From Usage to Grammar: The Mind's Response to Repetition

By Joan Bybee. 2007

1,774 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a5e7427f2bbc8256f3019956cf990ed3b7aee153

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Language and Linguistics

Citations in the corpus

The idiom principle revisited (2014, background): “…to language acquisition, processing, and use, our mental representations are determined purely by language use, or, in other words, by frequency (Bybee 1985, 1995, 1998, 2006; Langacker 1987; Goldberg 1995, 2006; Bod 1998, 2006; Croft 2001; Pierrehumbert 2001; Tomasello 2003, 2006; Abbot-Smith…”
More than words: Frequency effects for multi-word phrases (2010, methodology): “The frequency of a phrase will influence its entrenchment and future processing (Bod, Hay, & Jannedy, 2003; Bybee, 1998, 2006; Bybee & Hopper, 2001).”
of construction probability on word durations during spontaneous incremental sentence production (2012, background): “The multiple working hypotheses that we pursue in this paper require statistical inference for the effects of numerous, potentially collinear, independent variables (Chamberlin [1890] 1995).”
Language Proficiency in Native and Nonnative Speakers: An Agenda for Research and Suggestions for Second-Language Assessment (2011, neutral): “There is no need to postulate a language-speciﬁc faculty of mind; language knowledge is acquired with domain-general mechanisms (e.g., Bybee, 2006; Croft, 1995; Evans & Levinson, 2009; MacWhinney, 1999, 2008; Tomasello, 2008).”
Changing the World by Changing the Data (2021, background): “A key part of that change is the linguistic signals we encounter in communication: on the nativist account children have innate constraints that guide7 their learning from the data they encounter (Chomsky, 2014; Hornstein and Lightfoot, 1985), and on the usage-based accounts (Bybee, 2006; Lieven and”
How language production shapes language form and comprehension (2012, methodology): “…a more detailed study of language production mechanisms and language typology, there is relatively little consideration specifically of language production processes in the typology and universals literature (though see Bybee, 2006; also Jäger and Rosenbach, 2008, and associated commentaries).”
Object relatives made easy: A cross-linguistic comparison of the constraints influencing young children's processing of relative clauses (2007, background): “Following Bybee (2002, 2006), who argued that the representation of constituent structure is highly influenced by high frequency collocations, Reali and Christiansen (in press) suggested that highly frequent patterns within object RCs such as that I VERB become schematicised by the processor such…”
Responses to Wh-Questions in English Conversation (2010, neutral): “14 This claim is also suggested by much recent research on grammar as emergent structure ( Bybee 2002a , 2002b , 2006 , 2007 , 2009 ; Hopper 1987 , 1998 ; Larsen-Freeman, 2008 ; Thompson & Hopper, 2001 ; and Thompson & Couper-Kuhlen, 2005 ).”