More than words: Frequency effects for multi-word phrases

By Inbal Arnon, Neal Snider. 2010

618 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fba454db61a480dbe7f8ecf8e2e8f2bdd05e4f27

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

Citations in the corpus

What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension? (2015, background): “…(Boston et al., 2008; Demberg & Keller, 2008; Demberg et al., 2013; Frank & Bod, 2011; McDonald & Shillcock, 2003; Smith & Levy, 2013; see also Arnon & Snider, 2010).2 There is also recent evidence suggesting that surprisal correlates with the amplitude of the N400 to words within sentences…”
An amorphous model for morphological processing in visual comprehension based on naive discriminative learning. (2011, methodology): “…morphologically complex words (see, e.g., Baayen et al., 1997; Baayen, Wurm, & Aycock, 2007; Kuperman, Schreuder, Bertram, & Baayen, 2009), but recently for short sequences of words as well (Arnon & Snider, 2010; Bannard & Matthews, 2008; Shaoul, Westbury, & Baayen, 2009; Tremblay & Baayen, 2010).”
Consequences of the Now-or-Never bottleneck for signed versus spoken languages (2015, background): “…connectionist (e.g., Chang et al. 1999; Elman 1990; MacDonald & Christiansen 2002),15 exemplarbased (e.g., Bod 2009), and other usage-based (e.g., Arnon & Snider 2010; Bybee 2006) accounts of language acquisition tie learning and processing together – and assume that language is acquired…”
Subtlex-UK: A New and Improved Word Frequency Database for British English (2014, background): “Because extra information can be obtained from word combinations (Arnon & Snider, 2010; Baayen, Milin, Filipovic Durdevic, Hendrix, & Marelli, 2011; Siyanova-Chanturia, Conklin, & van Heuven, 2011), we also collected word bigram frequencies in the entire corpus (i.e., the frequency with which word…”
Argument Structure in Usage-Based Construction Grammar: Experimental and corpus-based perspectives (2015, background): “…sequences of words (e.g., all over the place, don’t have to worry, you don’t want to) are processed more easily (Tremblay, Derwing, & Libben, 2009; Arnon & Snider, 2010) and are repeated faster and with fewer mistakes (Bannard & Matthews, 2008; Bod, 1998; Tremblay, Derwing, Libben, & Westbury,…”
Digging up the building blocks of language: Age-of-acquisition effects for multiword phrases (2017, background): “It has recently been proposed that some of the difference between children's and adults' language learning can be related to adults relying less on multiword units as building blocks for language learning (Arnon, 2010; Arnon & Ramscar, 2012; Ellis, Simpson-Vlach, & Maynard, 2008; Wray, 1999).”
The idiom principle revisited (2014, background): “Indeed, lexical frequency effects are one of the most robust in psycholinguistic research (Balota and Chumbley 1984; Rayner and Duffy 1986; Monsell et al. 1989). As argued by Bod et al. (2003: 10), ‘frequency effects are everywhere’. Some researchers have gone as far as to suggest that frequency may”
Adding more fuel to the fire: An eye-tracking study of idiom processing by native and non-native speakers (2011, result): “These studies and other similar ones (Van Lancker et al., 1981; Bannard and Matthews, 2008; Arnon and Snider, 2010), imply that there are differences in the way people process novel language and formulaic speech.”
FREQUENCY OF INPUT AND L2 COLLOCATIONAL PROCESSING (2013, background): “…or not language users are sensitive to frequency effects across different levels of granularity: from morphemes, syllables, and words to phrasal and clausal structures (see, e.g., Alvarez, Carreiras, & Taft, 2001 ; Arnon & Snider, 2010 ; Bannard & Matthews, 2008 ; Reichle & Perfetti, 2003 ).”
Frequency in lexical processing (2016, background): “, 2002; Young and Rugg, 1992), of syllables (Carreiras, Alvarez and de Vega, 1993; Cholin, Schiller and Levelt, 2004; Barber, Vergara and Carreiras, 2004), and word n-grams (Tremblay and Baayen, 2010; Tremblay, Derwing, Libben and Westbury, 2011; Bannard and Matthews, 2008; Arnon and Snider, 2010; S”
Predicting form and meaning: Evidence from brain potentials (2016, background): “…that frequently occurring word sequences are comprehended more quickly than would be expected on the basis of their individual frequencies (Arnon & Snider, 2010; Tremblay, Derwing, Libben, & Westbury, 2011), suggesting that common sequences are represented (alongside individual words), in…”