Object relatives made easy: A cross-linguistic comparison of the constraints influencing young children's processing of relative clauses

By Evan Kidd, Silke Brandt, Elena Lieven, Michael Tomasello. 2007

224 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3e18740864c02242f0258ef42dbd168f2a25658e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Silke Brandt
2. Michael Tomasello
3. Elena Lieven
4. Patricia K. Kuhl

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Elena Lieven
2. Silke Brandt
3. Michael Tomasello
4. Henrike Moll
5. J. Call
6. Brian Hare
7. Adele E. Goldberg
8. Malinda Carpenter

In Language and Linguistics

1. Elena Lieven
2. Silke Brandt
3. Michael Tomasello
4. Malinda Carpenter
5. Gergely Csibra
6. Adele E. Goldberg
7. Richard Breheny
8. Adele E. Goldberg

Citations in the corpus

• Development of word order in German complement-clause constructions: Effects of input frequencies, lexical items, and discourse function (2010, methodology): “…both complex and simple (e.g. relative clauses or transitives), complement clauses are first used and understood when they contain the same lexical items that are most frequently used in these constructions in the input (e.g. Brooks & Tomasello 1999, Kidd et al. 2007, Tomasello 2003).”