Living apart, living together? The role of intergroup contact in social integration

By Miles Hewstone. 2009

118 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a59a37d0263628c9b37998d5f08be6a729fd9904

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

COLLECTIVE EFFICACY, DEPRIVATION AND VIOLENCE IN LONDON (2013, unknown): “This might be due to the fact that there is greater ethnic mixing in London, with Londoners more likely to experience meaningful social contact with people from other ethnicities (Hewstone, 2009).”
Indirect contact through book reading: Improving adolescents' attitudes and behavioral intentions toward immigrants (2012, background): “Liebkind and McAlister (1999) conducted a field experiment in which Finnish adolescents read several stories of positive contact, ostensibly experienced by sameage peers or by university students during encounters with foreigners.”
Intergroup contact and intergroup conflict. (2014, unknown): “This work has used diverse research methods (field studies, lab experiments, longitudinal surveys), and has had a profound impact on social policy in many countries (see Hewstone, 2009; Tausch, Kenworthy, & Hewstone, 2006, for reviews).”
Seeking and avoiding intergroup contact: Future frontiers of research on building social integration (2018, background): “Intergroup contact therefore contributes to health and productivity (Bécares, Stafford, & Nazroo, 2009; Hewstone, 2009).”
Improving intergroup relations with extended and vicarious forms of indirect contact (2014, background): “In the same period scholars also identified numerous mediators and moderators of contact effects (Hewstone, 2009; Hewstone & Swart, 2011; Hodson & Hewstone, 2013).”
Changing the ideological roots of prejudice: Longitudinal effects of ethnic intergroup contact on social dominance orientation (2014, methodology): “In sum, combining insights from intergroup contact research (e.g., Hewstone, 2009) with theorizing on SDO (e.g., Duckitt, 2001; Haley & Sidanius, 2005; Pratto et al., 2006), it can be expected that positive intergroup contact decreases SDO.”
Advances in Intergroup Contact (2012, background): “Indeed, the amount of work available that supports the contact hypothesis, and the progress made in understanding its mechanisms, has been argued to surely afford Allport’s “hypothesis” the title of a bona fide theory (Hewstone, 2009; Hewstone & Swart, 2011).”
Consequences of Diversity for Social Cohesion and Prejudice: The Missing Dimension of Intergroup Contact (2015, background): “…occurs via processes of generalization of positive attitudes from the encountered individual to the wider outgroup (see Brown & Hewstone, 2005; Hewstone, 2009), which are strengthened when group memberships are made salient, and occur especially via affective processes such as reduced…”
Secondary Transfer Effects of Intergroup Contact (2012, background): “Intergroup contact is one such strategy (see e.g., Hewstone 2009), yet intergroup contact with a wide range of groups is, of course, not a realistic possibility for everyone.”