Advances in Intergroup Contact

By Gordon Hodson, Miles Hewstone. 2012

111 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Marketing, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fa7a8125bad10950b9ec640310a6764edbdff4d4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Marketing

1. Kristof Dhont
2. Gordon Hodson

In Social Psychology

1. Kristof Dhont
2. Gordon Hodson
3. Miles Hewstone
4. Ana C. Leite
5. Loris Vezzali
6. D. Giovannini
7. D. Capozza
8. Ralf Wölfer

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Kristof Dhont
2. Miles Hewstone
3. Gordon Hodson
4. Loris Vezzali
5. D. Giovannini
6. Ana C. Leite
7. D. Capozza
8. Ralf Wölfer

Citations in the corpus

• Improving intergroup relations with extended and vicarious forms of indirect contact (2014, background): “A great deal of research has focused on direct, face-to-face contact as an effective prejudice reduction strategy (Hewstone & Swart, 2011; Hodson & Hewstone, 2013; Pettigrew & Tropp, 2011).”
• The person-based nature of prejudice: Individual difference predictors of intergroup negativity (2015, background): “Fortunately, intergroup contact (Allport, 1954; Hodson & Hewstone, 2013) offers special promise for improving outgroup attitudes among prejudice-prone persons, targeting many of the factors (e.g., threat) that characterise such individuals (Hodson, 2011).”
• Common Ideological Roots of Speciesism and Generalized Ethnic Prejudice: The Social Dominance Human–Animal Relations Model (SD–HARM) (2016, background): “For this reason, contact-based interventions offer particular promise (see Hodson & Hewstone, 2013).”