The novelty P3: an event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain's evaluation of novelty.

By David Friedman, Y. Cycowicz, H. Gaeta. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 2001

1,305 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a5976fd2c4c4c271e67da77dc71ffd2497bf44fc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

Citations in the corpus

Consciousness without a cerebral cortex: A challenge for neuroscience and medicine (2007, background): “…to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at be measured as a stereotyped scalp-recorded event-related potential, the so-called “novelty P3,” which indicates that a novel event has captured attention and, at that point in time, is most likely within the focus of mind (Friedman et al. 2001).”
Attention, Uncertainty, and Free-Energy (2010, background): “Indeed, novel stimuli generate a higher-amplitude P3a component than deviant but repeated stimuli (Friedman et al., 2001).”
Why do beliefs about intelligence influence learning success? A social cognitive neuroscience model. (2006, background): “Courchesne et al., 1975; Friedman et al., 2001 ), a potential that is reliably elicited in response to stimuli that are unexpected within a given task context.”
Prediction during language comprehension: benefits, costs, and ERP components. (2012, background): “The P300 is commonly divided into two subcomponents with different scalp distributions: a frontally-maximal P3a elicited when perceptually novel (typically unique) stimuli are interspersed among more common stimuli, and a parietally-maximal P3bwhose amplitude ismore strongly driven by the relevance ”
Novelty or Surprise? (2013, background): “The typical result of these tests is the manifestation of a positive wave of the electric ﬁeld happening about 200–300 ms after the odd stimulus and named “P300” or “P3” (Friedman et al., 2001).”
Multiple Time Scales of Adaptation in Auditory Cortex Neurons (2004, background): “…the mismatch negativity (MMN), which originates in the auditory cortex (Näätänen, 1992; Tiitinen et al., 1994; Jääskeläinen et al., 2004), and the P300, which has diffuse origins centered mostly in frontal cortex (Escera et al., 2000; Friedman et al., 2001; Ranganath and Rainer, 2003).”
Attentional systems in target and distractor processing: a combined ERP and fMRI study (2004, background): “Alternatively (or additionally), it might reflect response inhibition (Barcelo et al., 2002; Bruin et al., 2001; Courchesne et al., 1975; Escera et al., 2000; Friedman et al., 2001; Squires et al., 1975).”
A systems approach to appraisal mechanisms in emotion (2005, positive): “Consistently, Friedman et al. (2001) reviewed eight fMRI studies suggesting an involvement of the dorsolateral frontal areas and the temporo-parietal junction for the novelty appraisal, but only of the temporo-parietal junction for the detection of target stimuli.”
Action understanding and active inference (2011, neutral): “A ubiquitous late positive component it the P3b with a parietal (posterior) distribution seen in oddball paradigms and is thought to represent a context-updating operation (Donchin and Coles 1988; Friedman et al. 2001; Gómez et al. 2008).”
Recipes for the linear analysis of EEG (2005, background): “The nature of the task, with rather infrequent secondary task events, predicts N2 and P3b ERP activity (Friedman et al., 2001) locked to detected visual changes.”
Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b. (2007, positive): “This speculation is supported broadly by neurophysiological results (Friedman et al., 2001; Knight and Nakada, 1998; Nieuwenhuis et al., 2005; Ranganath and Rainer, 2003), experimental findings (Birbaumer and Elbert, 1988; Birbaumer et al., 1990), and personality ERP variation (DiTraglia and…”
Event-related potential studies of outcome processing and feedback-guided learning (2012, background): “Studies could benefit from measuring the frontally distributed P3a that peaks 60–80ms earlier than the P3b (Courchesne et al., 1975; Squires et al., 1975; Friedman et al., 2001), which according to a visual inspection is present in most of the ERP studies of outcome processing.”
Integration of fMRI and simultaneous EEG: towards a comprehensive understanding of localization and time-course of brain activity in target detection (2004, background): “Therefore, both the infrequent and the frequent tone have evoked a strong P3a component, representing an orientation reaction (Friedman et al., 2001).”
Physicians down-regulate their pain empathy response: An event-related brain potential study (2010, background): “Finally, familiarity to the stimuli is known to affect attention allocation, which in turn modulates the P3 amplitude (Friedman et al., 2001).”
The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: a review. (2007, background): “…of attention to a deviance in an unattended sound sequence or in some irrelevant feature of attended sounds (see Squires et al., 1975; Ford et al., 1976; Escera et al., 1998, 2001; Shestakova et al., 2002a; Wang et al., 2005b; for reviews, see Friedman et al., 2001; Ranganath and Rainer, 2003).”