The Use of Dependent Group Contingencies to Increase On-Task Behavior in Two General Education Classrooms.

By Paul W. Heering, D. Wilder. 2006

133 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a44705dabc43a017c367006230353b98726f564d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Daniel M. Maggin
2. Christopher H. Skinner
3. K. Scott
4. Austin H. Johnson
5. Tara C. Moore
6. Merilee McCurdy
7. D. Ciancio
8. David F. Cihak

Citations in the corpus

• A Meta-Analysis of School-Based Group Contingency Interventions for Students With Challenging Behavior: An Update (2017, background): “Group contingency interventions were defined as behavioral management systems in which reinforcement or punishment was delivered to a group of students based on the performance of one or more students in the class (Barrish, Saunders, & Wolf, 1969; Heering & Wilder, 2006).”
• Evaluating and Comparing the Effects of Group Contingencies on Mathematics Accuracy in a First-Grade Classroom: Class Average Criteria Versus Unknown Small-Group Average Criteria (2017, background): “Heering and Wilder (2006) found that randomly selected small-group dependent contingencies enhanced on-task behavior, but they did not measure academic performance.”