Self-efficacy, Controllability and Intention in the Theory of Planned Behavior: Measurement Redundancy or Causal Independence?

By Renee H. Rhodes, K. Courneya. 2003

124 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a34af9c02a09cedcfb7471e9cf72a97f8ff1096f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. N. Bautista
2. W. Boone

In Social Psychology

1. N. Bautista
2. W. Boone

In Sociology and Political Science

1. N. Bautista
2. W. Boone

Citations in the corpus

• Exploring the Impact of TeachME™ Lab Virtual Classroom Teaching Simulation on Early Childhood Education Majors’ Self-Efficacy Beliefs (2015, background): “Rhodes and Courneya (2003) explain this by stating that ‘‘Unmotivated individuals toward a behavior will likely respond that a behavior is difficult, and lack capability to perform it, regardless of whether they perceive they have the skills, opportunities, or resources to enact the behavior’’ (p.…”
• How well can the theory of planned behavior account for occupational intentions (2006, unknown): “…particularly those associated with personal and community quality of life, such as waste recycling (e.g. Davies, Foxall & Pallister, 2002; Chu & Chiu, 2003), diet (e.g. Lien, Lytle & Komro, 2002), exercise (e.g. Rhodes & Courneya, 2003) and road safety (e.g. Elliott, Armitage & Baughan, 2003).”