Four Subtle Sins in Scale Development: Some Suggestions for Strengthening the Current Paradigm

By L. Flynn, Dawn H. Pearcy. 2001

144 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Marketing, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a33f7401bdab4ac96453a4ee7d96ae25914277cb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Marketing

1. Thomas J. Zagenczyk
2. Marick F. Masters
3. Ray Gibney
4. Inda Sukati
5. A. Madahi

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Ray Gibney
2. Thomas J. Zagenczyk
3. Marick F. Masters
4. Inda Sukati
5. A. Madahi

Citations in the corpus

• The Effect of External Factors on Purchase Intention amongst Young Generation in Malaysia (2012, methodology): “According to Flynn and Pearcy (2001) and Grace (2005), used the Cronbach _ reliability coefficient, factor analysis and correlation analysis, the scale reliability and validity were evaluated.”
• Measuring the Motives of Sport Event Attendance: Bridging the Academic-Practitioner Divide to Understanding Behavior (2009, unknown): “Such an approach would also allow for tests of convergent, discriminant, and nomological validity to provide a stable and known factor structure so theorists may rely on its consistent performance in complex models (Flynn & Pearcy, 2001; Spector, 1992).”
• The Negative Aspects of Social Exchange: An Introduction to Perceived Organizational Obstruction (2009, methodology): “We chose to use a sample size of 300 because it meets the most stringent of the suggested sample sizes for an instrument containing 26 items (Flynn & Pearcy, 2001; Nunnally, 1978).”