Chandra Deep Field South: The 1 Ms Catalog
By R. Giacconi, Andrew Zirm, Junxian Wang, Piero Rosati, M. Nonino, P. Tozzi, R. Gilli, V. Mainieri, G. Hasinger, Lisa J. Kewley and 8 more. 2002
485 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a2b0f944b58d85cd0f209cd6bac7641684308778
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Astronomy and Astrophysics
- P. Hopkins
- L. Hernquist
- D. M. Alexander
- P. V. van Dokkum
- R. Somerville
- Christopher J. Conselice
- M. Franx
- R. Dav'e
Citations in the corpus
- Lyα Emission-Line Galaxies at z = 3.1 in the Extended Chandra Deep Field-South (2007, unknown): “…(GEMS; Rix et al. 2004); deep groundbasedUBVRIzJHK photometry from theMultiwavelength Survey by Yale-Chile (MUSYC; Gawiser et al. 2006b); mid- and far-IR observations from Spitzer, GOODS, and MUSYC; and deep X-ray data from Chandra (Giacconi et al. 2002; Alexander et al. 2003; Lehmer et al. 2005).”
- Mass-to-Light Ratios of Field Early-Type Galaxies at z ~ 1 from Ultradeep Spectroscopy: Evidence for Mass-dependent Evolution (2005, background): “Giacconi et al. (2002) and Alexander et al. (2003) provide catalogs of the CDFS data.”
- The evolution of the hard X-ray luminosity function of AGN (2009, methodology): “The Chandra Deep Fields-North (CDF-N; Alexander et al. 2003) and Chandra Deep Fields-South (CDF-S; Giacconi et al. 2002) have been key in studies of the XLF, providing the deepest available X-ray data and substantial programmes of spectroscopic follow-up of the X-ray sources to determine redshifts.”
- AGN Host Galaxies at z ~ 0.4-1.3: Bulge-dominated and Lacking Merger-AGN Connection (2005, background): “The 1–2 Ms Chandra Deep Fields (CDF-N and CDF-S; Brandt et al. 2001; Giacconi et al. 2002), which have now resolved much of the cosmic X-ray background into moderate-luminosity AGNs at (Alexander et al. 2003; Barger et al. 2003;z ∼ 1 Szokoly et al. 2004), provide a unique AGN sample to probe these…”
- THE CHANDRA COSMOS LEGACY SURVEY: OPTICAL/IR IDENTIFICATIONS (2015, background): “Chandra and XMM-Newton studies extended this relation to harder bands (Hornschemeier et al. 2001, 2-8 keV; Alexander et al. 2001, 2-8 keV; Giacconi et al. 2002, 0.5-10 keV; Fiore et al. 2003, 2-10 keV; Della Ceca et al. 2004, 4.5-7.5 keV; Cocchia et al. 2007, 2-10 keV).”
- THE 2 Ms CHANDRA DEEP FIELD-NORTH SURVEY AND THE 250 Ks EXTENDED CHANDRA DEEP FIELD-SOUTH SURVEY: IMPROVED POINT-SOURCE CATALOGS (2016, background): “Below we summarize the most significant results for CDFN and E-CDF-S, respectively.”
- The unresolved hard X-ray background: the missing source population implied by the Chandra and XMM-Newton deep fields (2004, background): “The Chandra Deep Field North (CDF-N) and Chandra Deep Field South (CDF-S) probe down to ∼1.4–2.8 × 10−16 erg cm−2s−1 (over 2–8 keV) and resolve ∼70–90 per cent of the background in this broad, hard band (Giacconi et al. 2002; Moretti et al. 2002; Alexander et al. 2003; and references therein).”
- Multiwavelength Study of Massive Galaxies at z ~ 2. II. Widespread Compton-thick Active Galactic Nuclei and the Concurrent Growth of Black Holes and Bulges (2007, methodology): “The deepest X-ray surveys available to date, performed with the Chandra satellite in the Chandra Deep Field South (Giacconi et al. 2002; GOODS-South field, GOODSS hereafter),Chandra Deep Field North (Alexander et al. 2003a; GOODS-North, GOODS-N hereafter), and with XMM-Newton(e.g., Hasinger 2004 in ”
- The HELLAS2XMM survey IV. Optical identifications and the evolution of the accretion luminosity in the Universe (2003, background): “Furthermore, the thick crosses, which represent the median with the quartile range in three flux intervals, show a general trend in the spectral shape, which becomes harder as the flux decreases (see e.g. Giacconi et al. 2002 and references therein).”
- GMASS ultradeep spectroscopy of galaxies at $z$ ~ 2 - II. Superdense passive galaxies: how did they form and evolve? (2008, methodology): “We searched for individual emission from the 13 objects in the present sample by cross-correlating the IRAC positions of our targets with the positions of X-ray sources as catalogued by Giacconi et al. (2002) and Alexander et al. (2003).”
- The Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey: Initial Results from Optical and Near-Infrared Imaging (2003, methodology): “THE CXO DATA CXO data in the GOODS fields were taken before the GOODS project began and are available from theCXO archive (Giacconi et al. 2002; Alexander et al. 2003).”
- AEGIS-X: THE CHANDRA DEEP SURVEY OF THE EXTENDED GROTH STRIP (2008, methodology): “…to the total observed counts, and thus provides a better description of the nature of faint sources than classical approaches normally employed (e.g. Giacconi et al. 2002; Alexander et al. 2003; Kim et al. 2007). π(S) is the prior probability distribution, and reflects our prior knowledge of the…”
- THE EVOLUTION OF X-RAY CLUSTERS OF GALAXIES (2002, methodology): “We have included the recent data from the Chandra Deep Fields North (Bauer et al. 2002) and South (Giacconi et al 2002), which have extended the number counts by two decades.”
- Cosmological Evolution of the Hard X-Ray Active Galactic Nucleus Luminosity Function and the Origin of the Hard X-Ray Background (2003, background): “He compiled only spectroscopically identified sources in the Chandra deep field south (Giacconi et al. 2002), CDFN, Lockman Hole, Lynx field, and SSA field.”
- Spitzer Power-Law Active Galactic Nucleus Candidates in the Chandra Deep Field-North (2007, background): “…withChandraandXMM-Newtonhave now resolved 70-90% of the cosmic X-ray background (CXRB) at 2-8 keV into discreet sources (Mushotzky et al. 2000; Giacconi et al. 2002; Alexander et al. 2003; Bauer et al. 2004; Worsley et al. 2004, 2005), detecting the majority of the Xray unobscured AGN…”
- A synthesis model for AGN evolution: supermassive black holes growth and feedback modes (2008, background): “The latter two limits have been chosen to match the observational limits of recent deep (Chandra Deep Field South, CDFS; Giacconi et al. 2002) and medium-deep (XMM-COSMOS, XCosmos; Hasinger et al. ) surveys.”
- Cosmic X-Ray Background and Earth Albedo Spectra with Swift BAT (2008, background): “The deepest X-ray surveys to date (Giacconi et al. 2002; Alexander et al. 2003; Hasinger 2004) have shown that up to virtually 100% of the<2 keV CXB radiation is accounted for by active galactic nuclei (AGNs) hosting accreting supermassive black holes (SMBHs).”