Mass-to-Light Ratios of Field Early-Type Galaxies at z ~ 1 from Ultradeep Spectroscopy: Evidence for Mass-dependent Evolution

By EL A.VANDERW, M. F. Ranx, P. V. D. okkum, IX H.-W.R, G. D. I. Llingworth, P. Osati. 2005

154 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present an analysis of the fundamental plane for a sample of 27 field early-type galaxies in the redshift range 0.6 < z < 1.15 in the Chandra Deep Field-South and the field of the background cluster RDCS 1252.9-2927. Sixteen of the galaxies are at z > 0.95. The galaxies in this sample have high signal-to-noise ratio spectra obtained at the Very Large Telescope and high-resolution imaging from the HST Advanced Camera for Surveys. From comparison with lower redshift data, we find that the mean evolution of the mass-to-light ratio (M/L) of our sample is Δ ln(M/LB) = (-1.74 ± 0.16)z, with a large galaxy-to-galaxy scatter. The strong correlation between M/L and rest-frame color indicates that the observed scatter is not due to measurement errors, but due to intrinsic differences between the stellar populations of the galaxies, such that our results can be used as a calibration for converting luminosities of high-redshift galaxies into masses. This pace of evolution is much faster than the evolution of cluster galaxies. However, we find that the measured M/L evolution strongly depends on galaxy mass. For galaxies with masses M > 2 × 1011 M☉, we find no significant difference between the evolution of field and cluster galaxies: Δ ln(M/LB) = (-1.20 ± 0.18)z for field galaxies and Δ ln(M/LB) = (-1.12 ± 0.06)z for cluster galaxies. The relation between the measured M/L evolution and mass is partially due to selection effects, as the galaxies are selected by luminosity, not mass. We calculate the magnitude of this effect for the subsample of galaxies with masses higher than M = 6 × 1010 M☉: the uncorrected value of the evolution is Δ ln(M/LB) = (-1.54 ± 0.16)z, whereas the corrected value is (-1.43 ± 0.16)z. However, even when taking selection effects into account, we still find a relation between M/L evolution and mass, which is most likely caused by a lower mean age and a larger intrinsic scatter for low-mass galaxies. Results from lensing early-type galaxies, which are mass selected, show a very similar trend with mass. This, combined with our findings, provides evidence for downsizing, i.e., for the proposition that low-mass galaxies are younger than high-mass galaxies. Previous studies of the rate of evolution of field early-type galaxies found a large range of mutually exclusive values. We show that these differences are largely caused by the differences between fitting methods: most literature studies are consistent with our result and with one another when using the same method. Finally, five of the early-type galaxies in our sample have AGNs. There is tentative evidence that the stellar populations in these galaxies are younger than those of galaxies without AGNs.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/431b223e524b056bf5b9f44eae92b3f257263ad6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

In Instrumentation

Citations in the corpus

The Evolving Luminosity Function of Red Galaxies (2006, background): “We caution that less luminous red galaxies are bluer than the ¼ 0:6 Gyr model and their stellar populations may exhibit more rapid luminosity evolution at z < 1 (e.g., Treu et al. 2005; van der Wel et al. 2005).”
UV Luminosity Functions at z~4, 5, and 6 from the Hubble Ultra Deep Field and Other Deep Hubble Space Telescope ACS Fields: Evolution and Star Formation History (2007, background): “…evolution, from the decrease in the cross-over mass between spheroids and disk galaxies (Bundy et al. 2005) to the greater late-stage star formation in the lowest luminosity ellipticals (e.g., Kodama et al. 2004; Cross et al. 2004; Treu et al. 2005; McIntosh et al. 2005; van der Wel et al. 2005).”
Determining the Properties and Evolution of Red Galaxies from the Quasar Luminosity Function (2005, methodology): “…z = 1 prediction is compared to several different observations, including those from 0.6 < z< 1.15 in the Chandra Deep Field-South sample of van der Wel et al. (2005) (cyan stars), thez = 1.237 cluster RDCS 1252.9-2927 sample of Holden et al. (2005) (purple squares), thez = 1.27 cluster RDCS…”
The SAURON project - IV. The mass-to-light ratio, the virial mass estimator and the Fundamental Plane of elliptical and lenticular galaxies (2005, result): “The observed age trend is consistent with evidences of downsizing (Cowie et al. 1996)from high redshift studies (e.g. di Serego Alighieri et al. 2005;Treu et al. 2005; van der Wel et al. 2005).”
Environment and self-regulation in galaxy formation (2009, background): “…1, that again find similar evolution in clusters and in the field (Treu et al. 2001; van Dokkum & Ellis 2003; di Serego Alighieri et al. 2005; van der Wel et al. 2005; Jørgensen et al. 2006; di Serego Alighieri, Lanzoni & Jørgensen 2006; Feulner, Hopp & Botzler 2006; Strazzullo et al. 2006; van…”
CAN MINOR MERGING ACCOUNT FOR THE SIZE GROWTH OF QUIESCENT GALAXIES? NEW RESULTS FROM THE CANDELS SURVEY (2011, background): “…van de Sande et al. 2011) have verified dynamically the high masses of selected 1 < z < 2 sources and, in conjunction with the abundance of dynamical masses for lower redshift sources (Treu et al. 2005; van der Wel et al. 2005), provided a valuable, independent confirmation of the size evolution.”
DISSIPATION AND EXTRA LIGHT IN GALACTIC NUCLEI. IV. EVOLUTION IN THE SCALING RELATIONS OF SPHEROIDS (2008, background): “2005; van der Wel et al. 2005; van Dokkum & van der Marel 2007; Brown et al. 2008).”
Formation of Early-Type Galaxies from Cosmological Initial Conditions (2005, background): “They naturally meet many observational constraints on the evolution of massive spheroidal galaxies (e.g., Treu et al. 2005; Thomas et al. 2005a; van der Wel et al. 2005).”
What Do We Learn from IRAC Observations of Galaxies at 2 < z < 3.5? (2006, methodology): “…at z> ∼ 2 is important since it is believed that at this epoch the most massive galaxies formed their stars (Glazebrook et al. 2004; van der Wel et al. 2005; 1 Based on observations with the Spitzer Space Telescope, which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute…”
The Fundamental Scaling Relations of Elliptical Galaxies (2005, background): “…of the FP changes with redshift owing to passive evolution of the stellar populations, there is still disagreement regarding the redshiftevolution of the FP tilt (e.g., Gebhardt et al. 2003; van Dokkum & Stanford 2003; van der Wel et al. 2005; Treu et al. 2005; di Serego Alighieri et al. 2005).”
Mass downsizing and ``top-down'' assembly of early-type galaxies (2006, background): “…lower mass ones, a trend for which ample evidence is growing both at low and high redshift (Cowie et al. 1996; Thomas et al. 2005; Tanaka et al. 2005; Kodama et al. 2004; van der Wel et al. 2005; Treu et al. 2005; di Serego et al. 2005; Juneau et al. 2005; Feulner et al. 2005; Bundy et al. 2006).”
The Stellar Mass Assembly of Galaxies from z = 0 to z = 4: Analysis of a Sample Selected in the Rest-Frame Near-Infrared with Spitzer (2007, background): “Also van der Wel et al. (2005) find signs of the formation of massive (M>2 × 1011 M⊙, according to these authors) early-type galaxies at z&2, while less massive systems present lower formation redshifts (1<z<2).”
THE COSMOLOGICAL SIZE AND VELOCITY DISPERSION EVOLUTION OF MASSIVE EARLY-TYPE GALAXIES (2011, methodology): “…envelopes (Carrasco et al. 2010; Szomoru et al. 2010) and measurements of higher velocity dispersions seem to independently confirm previous high mass estimates (van der Wel et al. 2005, 2009; Cenarro & Trujillo 2009; van Dokkum et al. 2009; Cappellari et al. 2009; Martinez-Manso et al. 2011).”
The Recent and Continuing Assembly of Field Elliptical Galaxies by Red Mergers (2005, methodology): “…of recent star formation in otherwise old ellipticals, and recent studies of the evolution of the fundamental plane relation (Djorgovski & Davis 1987) find evidence that low-mass early-type galaxies have lower luminosity-weighted ages than high-mass ones (Treu et al. 2005; van der Wel et al. 2005).”
Spatially resolved spectroscopy of early-type galaxies over a range in mass (2007, background): “Fainter galaxies may have formed a large percentage of their stars at later times (di Serego Alighieri et al. 2005; van der Wel et al. 2005; Holden et al. 2005).”
Structure and Star Formation in Galaxies out to z = 3: Evidence for Surface Density Dependent Evolution and Upsizing (2008, background): “The evolution of these correlations with redshift (e.g., Franx 1993, van Dokkum and Franx 1996, van der Wel et al. 2005, Treu et al. 2005, van Dokkum & van der Marel 2007) provide the evolution of the mass-tolight ratio with redshift, which is essential for a proper interpretation of the evolution…”
Galaxy Luminosity Functions to z~1 from DEEP2 and COMBO-17: Implications for Red Galaxy Formation (2005, background): “…findings by McIntosh et al. (2005) that smaller red-sequence galaxies evolve faster in surface brightness back in time than larger ones, by van der Wel et al. (2005) that the zeropoint of the fundamental plane evolves faster back in time for small galaxies than for brighter ones, by Bundy et al.…”