The HELLAS2XMM survey IV. Optical identifications and the evolution of the accretion luminosity in the Universe

By F. Fiore, M. Brusa, F. Cocchia, A. Baldi, N. Carangelo, P. Ciliegi, A. Comastri, F. Franca, R. Maiolino, G. Matt and 5 more. 2003

205 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present results from the photometric and spectroscopic identification of 122 X-ray sources recently discov- ered by XMM-Newton in the 2-10 keV band (the HELLAS2XMM 1dF sample). Their flux cover the range 8 10 15 4 10 13 erg cm 2 s 1 and the total area surveyed is 0.9 square degrees. One of the most interesting results (which is found also in deeper sourveys) is that about 20% of the hard X-ray selected sources have an X-ray to optical flux ratio (X/O) ten times or more higher than that of optically selected AGN. Unlike the faint sources found in the ultra-deep Chandra and XMM-Newton surveys, which reach X-ray (and optical) fluxes more than one order of magnitude lower than the HELLAS2XMM survey sources, many of the extreme X/O sources in our sample have R 10 (to be compared with 9 sources known from the deeper, pencil-beam surveys). Eight of them are narrow line QSO (seemingly the extension to very high luminosity of the type 2 Seyfert galax- ies), four are broad line QSO. The results from our survey are also used to make reliable predictions about the luminosity of the sources not yet spectroscopically identified, both in our sample and in deeper Chandra and XMM-Newton samples. We then use a combined sample of 317 hard X-ray selected sources (HELLAS2XMM 1dF, Chandra Deep Field North 1Msec, Chandra SSA13 and XMM-Newton Lockman Hole flux limited samples), 221 with measured redshifts, to evaluate the cosmo- logical evolution of the hard X-ray source's number and luminosity densities. Looking backward in time, the low luminosity sources (log L2 10 keV = 43 44 erg s 1 ) increase in number at a much slower rate than the very high luminosity sources (log L2 10 keV> 44: 5e rg s 1 ), reaching a maximum around z= 1 and then levelling o beyond z= 2. This translates into an accretion driven luminosity density which is dominated by sources with log L2 10 keV 44: 5e rg s 1 appear, with yet rather large uncertainties, to be comparable between z= 2 and 4.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a13022208a2c18dc8a4e026bf6125cc0f3c60c25

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

1. D. M. Alexander
2. P. Hopkins
3. L. Hernquist
4. W. N. Brandt
5. Thomas J. Cox
6. R. Hickox
7. E. Daddi
8. A. Koekemoer

Citations in the corpus

• Fueling Low-Level AGN Activity through Stochastic Accretion of Cold Gas (2006, background): “…in AGN and quasar evolution (Page et al. 1997; Miyaji et al. 2000, 2001; La Franca et al. 2002, 2005; Cowie et al. 2003; Ueda et al. 2003; Fiore et al. 2003; Hunt et al. 2004b; Cirasuolo et al. 2005; Hasinger, Miyaji, & Schmidt 2005), our modeling does not imply that the local activity…”
• The Cosmic Evolution of Hard X-Ray-selected Active Galactic Nuclei (2004, methodology): “Alternate Redshift Estimators Fiore et al. (2003) have pointed out a correlation between the X-ray–to–optical flux ratios and the hard X-ray luminosities of non–broad-line AGNs, such that higher X-ray luminosity sources tend to have higher X-ray–to–optical flux ratios.”
• An Observational Determination of the Bolometric Quasar Luminosity Function (2006, background): “X-ray studies (e.g., Page et al. 1997; Miyaji et al. 2000, 2001; La Franca et al. 2002; Cowie et al. 2003; Ueda et al. 2003; Fiore et al. 2003; Barger et al. 2003a; Hasinger et al. 2005) and some optical, radio, and IR measurements (e.g., Hunt et al. 2004; Cirasuolo et al. 2005; Matute et al. 2006)…”
• The unresolved hard X-ray background: the missing source population implied by the Chandra and XMM-Newton deep fields (2004, background): “A number of studies point to significant evolution of the spectral shape with flux (Ueda et al. 1999; Alexander et al. 2003; Fiore et al. 2003; Streblyanska et al. 2004), with sources brighter than ∼10−14 erg cm−2 s−1 having typical spectral slopes much softer than the = 1.4 of the total background.”
• What drives the growth of black holes (2011, background): “…luminous AGNs with L2−10keV > 1044–1045 erg s−1 peaks at zpeak = 1–2 and drops by ≈ 2–3 orders of magnitude to z ≈ 0 and ≈ 0–1 order of magnitude to z ≈ 5 (e.g., Fiore et al., 2003; Ueda et al., 2003; Shankar et al., 2004, 2009; Barger et al., 2005; Hasinger et al., 2005; Hopkins et al., 2007;…”
• Enhanced star formation rates in AGN hosts with respect to inactive galaxies from PEP-Herschel observations (2012, background): “…their luminosity-dependent evolution with redshift: the space density of luminous AGNs peak atz ∼ 2, while that of lower luminosity AGNs has its maximum atz ∼ 1 (e.g. Cowie et al. 2003; Fiore et al. 2003; La Franca et al. 2005; Hasinger et al. 2005; Brandt & Hasinger 2005; Bongiorno et al. 2007).”
• THE CHANDRA COSMOS LEGACY SURVEY: OPTICAL/IR IDENTIFICATIONS (2015, methodology): “Fiore et al. (2003) showed the existence of a linear correlation between X/O and the hard X-ray luminosities for Type 2 AGN.”
• Chandra and Spitzer Unveil Heavily Obscured Quasars in the Chandra/SWIRE Survey (2006, background): “Obscured AGN candidates have been selected among X-ray sources with hard X-ray spectra or with high (>10) X-ray/optical flux ratios (Fiore et al. 2003; Rigby et al. 2004), with radio emission in excess compared to the IR (Donley et al. 2005; Urrutia et al. 2005) or with narrow emission lines in…”
• The HELLAS2XMM Survey. VII. The Hard X-Ray Luminosity Function of AGNs up to z = 4: More Absorbed AGNs at Low Luminosities and High Redshifts (2005, methodology): “In order to cover the widest possible range of luminosities and redshifts, we combined the HELLAS2XMM sample (Fiore et al. 2003) with other existing flux-limited samples, which allowed estimates of the rest-frame NH column density of each AGN.”
• Cosmic X-ray surveys of distant active galaxies (2015, background): “…sources with reasonably complete spectroscopic identification down to I = 22–24 are now available for statistical studies (e.g., Barger et al 2003b; Fiore et al 2003; Szokoly et al 2004; Eckart et al 2006; Della Ceca et al 2008; Trouille et al 2008; Trump et al 2009; Silverman et al 2010;…”
• The synthesis of the cosmic X-ray background in the Chandra and XMM-Newton era (2006, methodology): “…scientific goals, the most efficient approach is to combine deep pencil beamChandra and XMM–Newton pointings with shallower surveys over much larger sky areas (e.g. the ASCA Medium and Large Sensitivity Surveys; Ueda et al. 2001; the HELLAS and HELLAS2XMM surveys; Fiore et al. 2001, 2003).”
• Cosmological simulations of black hole growth: AGN luminosities and downsizing (2013, unknown): “…range (XMM–Newton, Chandra, ROSAT, ASCA, eRosita; e.g. Miyaji, Hasinger & Schmidt 2000; La Franca et al. 2002; Barger et al. 2003; Cowie et al. 2003; Fiore et al. 2003, 2012; Ueda et al. 2003; Sazonov & Revnivtsev 2004; Barger & Cowie 2005; Hasinger, Miyaji & Schmidt 2005; Nandra, Laird & Steidel…”
• Accreting supermassive black holes in the COSMOS field and the connection to their host galaxies (2012, background): “…in their space density later in the history of the Universe (i.e. at lower redshift) than higher luminosity AGNs (Miyaji, Hasinger & Schmidt 2000; Fiore et al. 2003; Ueda et al. 2003; Cirasuolo, Magliocchetti & Celotti 2005; Hasinger, Miyaji & Schmidt 2005; La Franca et al. 2005; Bongiorno et…”
• The anti‐hierarchical growth of supermassive black holes (2004, background): “…sources that most contribute to the XRB (Alexander et al. 2001; Barger et al. 2002; Mainieri et al. 2002; Rosati et al. 2002; Hasinger 2003; Fiore et al. 2003), the newest synthesis models seem to suggest that indeed a substantial fraction of the locally measured mass density of SMBH…”
• The XMM-Newton Wide-Field Survey in the COSMOS Field. III. Optical Identification and Multiwavelength Properties of a Large Sample of X-Ray-Selected Sources (2006, background): “3), which is consistent with or even better than the ∼ 80% within 3′′ found in XMM–Newton data of comparable depth (see e.g. Fiore et al. 2003; Della Ceca et al. 2004; Loaring et al. 2005).”
• The X-Ray Spectral Properties of SCUBA Galaxies (2005, background): “Further z > 1 obscured AGNs are likely to have been detected in X-ray surveys but lack spectroscopic redshifts due to the faintness of their optical counterparts (e.g., Alexander et al. 2001; Barger et al. 2002; Fiore et al. 2003; Treister et al. 2004; Mainieri et al. 2005b).”
• THE CHANDRA COSMOS SURVEY. III. OPTICAL AND INFRARED IDENTIFICATION OF X-RAY POINT SOURCES (2012, methodology): “With the advent ofChandraand XMM-Newton, the same relation has been used in harder bands (Hornschemeier et al. 2001, Alexander et al. 2001, Fiore et al. 2003, Della Ceca et al. 2004, Cocchia et al. 2007).”
• AGN wind scaling relations and the co-evolution of black holes and galaxies (2017, background): “…that the luminosity dependent evolution of AGN, with lower luminosity AGN peaking at a redshift lower than luminous QSOs (Ueda et al. 2003, 2014; Fiore et al. 2003; La Franca et al. 2005; Brandt & Hasinger 2005; Bongiorno et al. 2007; Aird et al. 2015; Brandt & Alexander 2015), mirrors that of…”