The Process Writing Approach: A Meta-analysis

By Steve Graham, Karin Sandmel. 2011

316 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a1c2152ab1a4c2e83807552f8573f6615a1078e1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

In Language and Linguistics

In Literature and Literary Theory

Citations in the corpus

Teaching Writing in Primary Education: Classroom Practice, Time, Teachers’ Beliefs and Skills (2018, background): “Process writing is used all over the world and there is evidence that supports its effectiveness (Graham & Sandmel, 2011; Ivanič, 2004).”
A Meta-Analysis of Writing Instruction for Students in the Elementary Grades. (2012, background): “…goals (cf. Graham & Perin, 2007a); prewriting activities (cf. Graham & Perin, 2007a); word processing (cf. Bangert-Drowns, 1993; Goldberg et al., 2003; Graham & Perin, 2007c; Morphy & Graham, 2012); and the process approach to writing instruction (cf. Graham & Perin, 2007a; Graham & Sandmel, 2011).”
Does a Process-Genre Approach Help Improve Students’ Argumentative Writing in English as a Foreign Language? Findings From an Intervention Study (2020, unknown): “Following recent calls for high-quality research to examine the effectiveness of the most promising hybrid of the process- and genre-based approaches (Graham & Sandmel, 2011), an intervention study was designed.”
The Relationship Between Component Skills and Writing Quality and Production Across Developmental Levels (2016, methodology): “…approaches to writing instruction have become prevalent in schools, and have been shown to have positive effects on writing for typical learners (Graham & Sandmel, 2011), it has been argued that such approaches should also incorporate direct instruction in specific skills and strategies,…”
Handbook of Research on Learning and Instruction (2011, methodology): “Under this influence, scholars have applied three models to explain and guide learning in the psychomotor domain: information processing, expertise-novice comparison, and dynamical systems.”