Culture as a consequence: A multi-level multivariate meta-analysis of the effects of individual and country characteristics on work-related cultural values

123 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Opposite Ends of the Same Stick? Multi-Method Test of the Dimensionality of Individualism and Collectivism (2014, background): “For example, demographic characteristics such as gender, age, education, and socioeconomic status may not only shape cultural orientation (e.g., Steel & Taras, 2010) but also value structure (e.g., Fischer, Milfont, & Gouveia, 2011; Fontaine, Poortinga, Delbeke, & Schwartz, 2008).”
Situational job characteristics and job satisfaction: The moderating role of national culture (2015, background): “Another issue concerns the use of national cultural scores for individuals (for a general discussion, see e.g. Brewer & Venaik, 2010; Brewer & Venaik, 2011; Steel & Taras, 2010).”
State of the art themes in cross-cultural communication research: A systematic and meta-analytic review (2014, methodology): “…viewed the two as the two poles of a single construct, and consistent with the methodology of earlier cultural meta-analyses (e.g., Oyserman et al., 2002; Steel & Taras, 2010; Taras, Kirkman, et al., 2010; Taras, et al., 2010), we combined them into a single individualism–collectivism dimension.”
Negative practice–value correlations in the GLOBE data: Unexpected findings, questionnaire limitations and research directions (2010, background): “Vocal Minority As Steel and Taras (2010) show, there is still a considerable amount of cultural heterogeneity within any country.”