11. Motivation on a Per-Second Timescale: Examining Approach- Avoidance Motivation During L2 Task Performance

By P. Macintyre, Alicia Serroul. 2014

114 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a0d206eb0e311c849b89d6f2f5fca3e166677ca2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Language and Linguistics

Citations in the corpus

Task preference, affective response, and engagement in L2 use in a US university context (2017, background): “Finally, the finding that perceived difficulty with the task and perceived lack of control were associated with negative responses was consistent with previous studies (Egbert, 2003; Préfontaine & Kormos, 2015; MacIntyre & Serroul, 2015; Mercer, 2015; Kormos & Préfontaine, 2017).”
Enjoyment and anxiety in second language communication: An idiodynamic approach (2018, methodology): “Another study used the idiodynamic method to look at approach-avoidance motivation in a second language communication task (MacIntyre & Serroul, 2015).”
Mindsets as sources of L2 speaking anxiety and self-confidence: the case of international teaching assistants in the U.S. (2021, unknown): “The dynamic approach includes research studies related to L2 anxiety and its continuous interaction with other factors such as linguistic abilities, physiological reactions, and pragmatics over time in contextualized settings (e.g., Gregersen, MacIntyre, and Meza 2014; MacIntyre and Serroul 2014).”
The Routledge handbook of English language teaching (2018, methodology): “In this chapter, we have proposed teaching/ testing conceptual thinking in the ELT classroom through mindful conceptual engagement activity, a dynamic and conscious process by which learners reflect on their communicative choices by using concepts with the intent of constructing new understandings.”
The L2 motivational self system: A meta-analysis (2018, background): “In the Canadian context, MacIntyre and Serroul (2015) examined the relationship between the ideal L2 self and actual L2 performance in their idiodynamic paradigm, which measures individual motivational variability on a persecond timescale.”