The Structure of Attitudes.
By L. Fabrigar, T. MacDonald, Duane T. Wegener. 2005
283 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a0cdb8f83aa2d57e356696bb59ce07bf170d2e6d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- J. Doucette
- Joel B. Cohen
- Americus Reed
- P. Macintyre
- D. Cheung
- G. Maio
- Jean–Marc Dewaele
- Chengchen Li
Citations in the corpus
- A Multiple Pathway Anchoring and Adjustment (MPAA) Model of Attitude Generation and Recruitment (2006, methodology): “One exception to this is when accessibility plays a fluency-like role, leading to the inference that the attitude is important, correct, or strongly held (Fabrigar et al. 2005).”
- Mental representations of social values (2010, background): “unfavorability) toward diverse attitude targets (Fabrigar et al., 2005; Maio & Haddock, 2007) and worth considering as an explanation of the psychological information used in judgments of the importance of diverse values (Rokeach, 1973).”
- Developing a Scale to Measure Students’ Attitudes toward Chemistry Lessons (2009, result): “All the correlations were positive and considerable, indicating that student responses to the four subscales were fairly consistent, and thus no attitudinal ambivalence (Fabrigar et al., 2005) occurred.”
- Willingness to communicate and action control (2010, background): “Fabrigar et al. (2005) note that the link between global attitudes and behaviour in a specific situation may be inconsistent if the global attitude is not considered applicable to that specific situation.”