Mental representations of social values

By G. Maio. 2010

264 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1f09333cdceae518c0132db8311cfc2a734fa791

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

An Integrated Framework for Encouraging Pro-environmental Behaviour: The role of values, situational factors and goals (2014, background): “We argue that people are more likely to act upon their biospheric values when these values are activated and supported by cues present in the situation in which choices are made (Lindenberg & Steg, 2013a; Maio, 2010; Verplanken & Holland, 2002).”
The relationship between Corporate Environmental Responsibility, employees’ biospheric values and pro-environmental behaviour at work (2017, background): “These findings are an important addition to research showing that contextual factors especially affect behaviour of people with strong biospheric values (e.g., Maio, 2010; Verplanken & Holland, 2002).”
The Significance of Hedonic Values for Environmentally Relevant Attitudes, Preferences, and Actions (2014, background): “Indeed, human values are believed to play an important role in proenvironmental actions (Crompton & Kasser, 2009; Dunlap, Grieneeks, & Rokeach, 1983; Maio, 2010; Naess, 1989).”
Personal Values Before and After Migration (2011, background): “The existing research on real-life value change has primarily been conducted with matched samples (we contrast real-life value change with temporary value change induced in the laboratory, for instance, by instructing participants to think of reasons for their values, see Maio, 2010).”
The motivation and inhibition of breaking the rules: : Personal values structures predict unethicality (2015, background): “…considered inherently desirable representations of social cognitions that are generally accessible and quite easily articulated or discussed (for a discussion of the differences between personal values, attitudes, goals, needs, and traits, see Maio, 2010; Roccas, Sagiv, Schwartz, & Knafo, 2002).”
Values at Work: The Impact of Personal Values in Organisations (2019, unknown): “This model is currently the dominant theory in values’ research (Rohan, 2000; Knafo, Roccas, & Sagiv, 2011; see also Maio, 2010) and many of the studies on the implications of values in organisational settings in the last two decades are based on it.”
The Dual Route to Value Change: Individual Processes and Cultural Moderators (2011, background): “This effect was later established in many experiments (reviewed in Maio, 2010).1 However, values that were held with established cognitive support did not change, as people were able to elicit counterarguments for the value-change messages (see Maio, 2010).”
Values, Norms, and Intrinsic Motivation to Act Proenvironmentally (2016, background): “Furthermore, biospheric values may not always be activated in the particular context where choices are made (39, 65).”
Integrating who “we” are with what “we” (will not) stand for: A further extension of the Social Identity Model of Collective Action (2018, background): “One of the reasons for this inconsistency may be that values operate as abstract principles, whereas behaviours are more concrete and situation-specific (Maio, 2010; Maio, Hahn, Frost, & Cheung, 2009).”
Functional theory of human values: Testing its content and structure hypotheses (2014, background): “Schwartz’s theory of values is an important legacy in social psychology that provides conceptual, methodological, and empirical contributions to map a set of universal values (Maio, 2010; Schwartz, 2011).”