Neuromyths: Why Do They Exist and Persist?
By Elena Pasquinelli. 2012
168 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a0914451157411e9191b014a739153872ce0926a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Patricia A. Alexander
- Priti Shah
- Richard E. Mayer
- Susan A. Gelman
- Shaylene E. Nancekivell
- Roxana Moreno
- Logan Fiorella
Citations in the corpus
- Handbook of Research on Learning and Instruction (2011, background): “Feedback can be used to enhance particular types of motor skill learning within certain practice conditions (Magill, 2009).”
- Maybe they’re born with it, or maybe it’s experience: Toward a deeper understanding of the learning style myth. (2020, background): “However, prior work on lay beliefs about learning and the brain suggests that the general public lacks insight into the mechanisms that underlie learning (see Bjork, Dunlosky, & Kornell, 2013; Pasquinelli, 2012 for reviews).”
- Neuromyths among Teachers and Student Teachers. (2015, unknown): “3 Although several publications stress the presence of neuromyths in the field of education (e.g., Ansari & Coch, 2006; Geake, 2008; Goswami, 2006; Lindell & Kidd, 2011; Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2002; Pasquinelli, 2012; Tardif & Doudin, 2011), few studies have sought t”