The Ecosystem Services Framework and Natural Capital Conservation

By R. Turner, Gretchen Daily. 2008

563 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a042c8d055acfe28b87c9e380f8e482a58cedc11

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Global and Planetary Change

Citations in the corpus

A review and application of the evidence for nitrogen impacts on ecosystem services (2014, background): “Ecosystem Services frameworks are emerging as a way of capturing the wider effects of policy decisions or evaluating land use change in order to more comprehensively take into account the range of impacts on the environment, and on the benefits humans receive from it (Turner and Daily, 2008).”
Quantifying fish and mobile invertebrate production from a threatened nursery habitat (2016, background): “Advancing a wider societal recognition of the ecological importance of biogenic habitats has been a major accomplishment of conservation science over the last couple of decades (Turner & Daily 2008).”
Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values (2012, background): “Integrating ecological and economic approaches has been an important area for advancement in ES research (Turner and Daily, 2008), and this integration has contributed to policy development, most notably with payment for ecosystem services programs (Eigenraam et al., +1 604 822 9250.”
Cost-benefit analysis in the context of ecosystem services for human well-being: A multidisciplinary critique (2011, background): “climate regulation) (Turner and Daily, 2008).”
Research, part of a Special Feature on Resilience and Vulnerability of Arid and Semi-Arid Social Ecological Systems Anticipating Vulnerability to Climate Change in Dryland Pastoral Systems: Using Dynamic Systems Models for the Kalahari (2010, background): “The need to value these broader ecosystem services is a vital next step required for research in this region, as in other drylands (Turner and Daily 2008).”
Integrating ecosystem-service tradeoffs into land-use decisions (2012, background): “, landowners and land managers through their choices of land-use and management practices) and those actors who benefit from ecosystem-service provision (36, 37).”
Soil “Ecosystem” Services and Natural Capital: Critical Appraisal of Research on Uncertain Ground (2016, background): “Identification of the various services afforded by nature to human populations is merely the first step in the application of the “ESF” in its traditional form, and is typically followed by attempts to proceed with the monetary valuation of these services, so that they can be taken into account in f”
Economic Analysis for Ecosystem Service Assessments (2011, background): “…assigned intrinsic values for issues such as cultural and social norms, democratic freedoms, etc. (see, for example, Hargrove, 1992; Sen, 1999; Turner and Daily, 2008), from an economic perspective much of the so called ‘intrinsic’ values of ecosystem services would instead be reclassified as…”
Ecosystem Services: Origins, Contributions, Pitfalls, and Alternatives (2013, background): “We disagree with Turner et al. (1994) and Brown (1994) who assert that”
Coastal and marine ecosystem services valuation for policy and management: Managed realignment case studies in England (2011, background): “This has in turn led to calls for an ecosystem services approach to support the case formore protected areas or bettermanagement and sustainable use of ecosystems under threat of conversion or degradation (Balmford et al., 2002; Bockstael et al., 2000; Costanza et al., 1997; Daily, 1997; Daily and E”
Payments for environmental services as neoliberal market-based forest conservation in Vietnam: Panacea or problem? (2012, background): “Some ecologists and biologists espouse support for PES as a way to slow the degradation of biodiversity by providing incentives to reduce the pressure on natural capital stocks; this was a major message of the influential Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (Mertz et al., 2007; Turner and Daily, 2008; M”
Ecosystem services (2011, unknown): “Although it is often conflated with the more broadly based ‘ecosystem approach’, the so-called ‘ecosystem services approach’ (cf. Turner and Daily, 2008) is put forward as a way of developing integrated solutions to the problem of understanding the nature and scale of ecosystem degradation.”