Integrating ecosystem-service tradeoffs into land-use decisions

By J. Goldstein, G. Caldarone, T. Duarte, D. Ennaanay, N. Hannahs, G. Mendoza, Stephen Polasky, S. Wolny, Gretchen Daily. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012

711 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6bd82170fe17aa7f4e21823d48b8e051c9b55455

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Global and Planetary Change

Citations in the corpus

A place-based approach to payments for ecosystem services (2017, background): “, 2013); and trade-offs between ecosystem services under different land use scenarios (Goldstein et al., 2012).”
Elasticity in ecosystem services: exploring the variable relationship between ecosystems and human well-being (2016, background): “For example landscape-scale modeling of ecosystem services has led to an improved understanding of generation of different ecosystem services (e.g., Goldstein et al. 2012) but has generally not evaluated how these services actually contribute to people’s well-being.”
Assessing Land Use Change and Its Impact on Ecosystem Services in Northern Thailand (2016, background): “For each land use, the estimates of carbon pool, namely dead organic matter, above and belowground biomass and soil organic matter in soil are needed [16,20,40,41] to subsequently put into the land use maps and then create an integrated map showing the carbon stock contained in each cell.”
Impacts of Land-Use and Land-Cover Changes on Water Yield: A Case Study in Jing-Jin-Ji, China (2018, methodology): “The InVEST model has been widely applied to evaluate ecosystem services concerning the impact of LULC change [81].”
Interactions Among Ecosystem Services Across Land Uses in a Floodplain (2014, background): “Most studies of multiple ES use GIS and satellite images (Kreuter et al. 2001, Konarska et al. 2002, Chen et al. 2009), global databases (Viglizzo and Frank 2006, Tianhong et al. 2010), or models to estimate ES provision (Nelson et al. 2009, Goldstein et al. 2012).”
Monetary accounting of ecosystem services: a test case for Limburg province, the Netherlands. (2015, background): “In addition, monetary valuation can help to develop better informed land-use decisions (Goldstein et al., 2012).”
Land use intensification alters ecosystem multifunctionality via loss of biodiversity and changes to functional composition (2015, background): “2014) and they may have little relevance to land managers, who typically seek to maximise a subset of functions and services (Reed et al. 2009; Goldstein et al. 2012).”
Creating win-wins from trade-offs? Ecosystem services for human well-being: A meta-analysis of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies in the real world (2014, background): “Improved cropland and grassland management, expansion of agro-forestry systems and protection of forested areas, potentially through the creation of riparian buffer zones (Branca et al., 2013; Goldstein et al., 2012; Gundersen et al., 2010) or switching to alternative crop systems such as legumes or”
Estimating Pinus palustris tree diameter and stem volume from tree height, crown area and stand-level parameters (2014, background): “Forests are a significant proportion of the terrestrial biosphere and are important not only economically, but also for the ecosystem services associated with forested landscapes (Thompson et al. 2011; Goldstein et al. 2012).”