Payments for environmental services as neoliberal market-based forest conservation in Vietnam: Panacea or problem?
By P. McElwee. 2012
222 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Political Science and International Relations
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/24021698aa760bd7ad2078d06e2ef5a3fb7f3a82
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Global and Planetary Change
- Elizabeth Shapiro‐Garza
- D. Raffaelli
- Piran C. L. White
- W. Dressler
- M. Rudd
- Robin Roth
- A. Hejnowicz
- G. Woodward
In Political Science and International Relations
Citations in the corpus
- Property Rights Regimes and Natural Resources: A Conceptual Analysis Revisited (2017, unknown): “In Vietnam, for example, the provincial government holds the right to receive and disburse payments from forest service; in turn, this right may be exercised to retain the payments received from service buyers, instead of disbursing them to forest holders (McElwee, 2011:420).”
- Trajectories of deforestation, coffee expansion and displacement of shifting cultivation in the Central Highlands of Vietnam (2013, unknown): “Furthermore, in that region very few households hold title on forestlands, thus making them 540 legally unable to receive payments except as contract for labour (McElwee 2012).”
- Contesting the market-based nature of Mexico’s national payments for ecosystem services programs: Four sites of articulation and hybridization (2013, background): “…for ecosystem services includes work on wetlands banking in the United States (Robertson, 2000, 2004, 2006, 2007), PES initiatives in Vietnam (McElwee, 2012; Xuan To et al., 2012) and Costa Rica (Fletcher and Breitling, 2012), and markets for forest-based carbon offsets broadly (Lovbrand and…”
- Evaluating the outcomes of payments for ecosystem services programmes using a capital asset framework (2014, background): “…and a ‘commodity fiction’ (Gomez-Baggethun and Ruíz-Perez, 2011; Muradian and Rival, 2012; Robertson, 2012); and the perception that MBIs represent encroaching neo-liberalist interventions (McAfee and Shapiro, 2010; McElwee, 2012; Arsel and Büscher, 2012; McAfee, 2012; Shapiro-Garza, 2013).”
- The political ecology of ecosystem services (2015, unknown): “…cases, they are mostly used by States to reinforce their environmental agendas without allowing new directions in such policies (Roth and Dressler, 2012; McElwee, 2012), so that policies and practices around the ES concept deviate considerably from neoliberal doctrine (Dempsey and Roberston, 2012).”
- Market-oriented conservation governance: The particularities of place (2012, background): “always recognizable as neoliberal interventions when viewed from the ground (McAfee and Shapiro, 2010; McElwee, 2012).”