Contract cheating: a new challenge for academic honesty?

By M. Walker, C. Townley. 2012

122 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Safety Research, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a024920596f14491724785ac2ce0b8ed19d41dd2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems and Management

1. P. Newton

In Safety Research

1. Rowena Harper
2. K. van Haeringen
3. Cath Ellis
4. Pearl Rozenberg
5. P. Newton
6. Tracey Bretag
7. M. Burton
8. S. Saddiqui

In Social Psychology

1. P. Newton

Citations in the corpus

• Does authentic assessment assure academic integrity? Evidence from contract cheating data (2020, background): “…make clear what effect the solution will have (e.g., prevention, reduction, deterrence) but also provide no evidence to support the claims they make (Clarke & Lancaster, 2007; Collins et al., 2014; Hodgkinson et al., 2016; Mahmood, 2009; O’Malley & Roberts, 2012; QAA, 2017; Walker & Townley, 2012).”
• Contract cheating: a survey of Australian university students (2019, background): “We concur with other researchers (Newton and Lang 2016; Walker and Townley 2012) that simplistic remedies, such as a return to highstakes, invigilated examinations, are likely to be counter-productive in addressing a problem as complex as contract cheating.”